groet

joined 4 months ago
[–] groet@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Isnt that several years old? Or did it happen again?

[–] groet@infosec.pub 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is Satire. Its not real.

[–] groet@infosec.pub 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Never heard of iDEAL. Wikipedia says its a a Dutch system that was acquired by the "European payments initiative" last year. The EPI just became active as a payment system 1 month ago.

This is VERY much still in development and not at all an established system in the EU.

[–] groet@infosec.pub 4 points 2 months ago

Both charts are in L of pure alcohol. I feel like they are not the "top counties" but just a random selection. And the selection is different for both charts.

TLDR chart bad

[–] groet@infosec.pub 36 points 2 months ago (3 children)

So Uganda Drinks 14L of "other" but doesn't appear at all in the total consumption?

[–] groet@infosec.pub 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fines as a percentage of income is a good idea for individuals but I dont think it works for coorperations.

A more reasonable approach is:

  • 100% of the money they earned/saved by comiting the crime
  • 100% of all damages caused to other people/cost to clean up results of the crime (includes the cost of investigation and prosecution)
  • a fine that represents the likelihood of getting caught. (If the crime earns me 1mil, the fine is 50mil but I only have a 1% chance to get caught, statistically I should commit the crime as many times as possible because I will end up wining in the end)
  • (optionally) a fine based on the crime. This one might be based on the size of the company. This is the "punishment" part. It probably should be payed by the individuals responsible and not the company.

This third point is the important one. Cooperations comit crimes because they are reasonable monetary investments. If the expected fines are always higher than the expected earnings, crimes become a bad investment.

[–] groet@infosec.pub 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Are those seconds? As in is 100 = one minute or 100 seconds? Because

111sec ~= 2min

444sec ~= 7 1/2 min

999sec ~= 16 1/2 min

[–] groet@infosec.pub 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There is abig difference between those two games though. With bg3 you got a limited part of a story driven game. You could never reach "endgame". It was a horizontal demo. You get everything until a certain point.

With satisfactory the early access was the fully playable game from beginning to end. It is vertical. And since then they have just added more things. They will very likely keep doing exactly what they are doing now after the release. In one year the game will have more content than it does now and in retrospect, deciding which version in time is 1.0 is arbitrary.

BG3 will not get a 4th chapter in a year.

And games have been tested long before early access and similar models existed. Just because Bethesda can't test their games doesn't mean everybody else is shit too.

[–] groet@infosec.pub 4 points 3 months ago

I've seen things you people wouldn't believe... Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion... I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain... Time to die you piece of shit!

[–] groet@infosec.pub 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Only if they can be turned off (same as the cryo sleep). The whole ship either has to have enough energy to last potentially 100000 years (no theoretical power source exists like that) or enter a state of 0 energy consumption. Solar/radiation collectors dont work if you are to far from a star. Synthetic life still needs energy

[–] groet@infosec.pub 57 points 3 months ago (4 children)

While I agree on the facts I want to offer a slightly different (possible) conclusion: a organisation like wikileaks needs resources and supporters. If they are targeted by all the "good guy"-countries and the only one willing to support them is "evil guy" Russia, then they are not in a position to resist. They chose to compromise their integrity instead of just not existing.

If the western world wants a whistleblower/leaks organisation that follows journalistic integrity and ethics, they need to fund it even if it leaks their own internal documents.

[–] groet@infosec.pub 5 points 3 months ago

Dont think its quantum. Its all deterministic and based on the music of the ainur. So its analog.

view more: next ›