You give him too much credit, he didn't write the song. In fact, he only wrote four songs from his ten albums, most recently in 2009. Like most of his country contemporaries he's not an artist, just a pandering performer.
gonzoleroy
joined 1 year ago
She doesn't have any sense at all, does she? She has no business even running a bake sale. I'll never understand why so many choose to be represented by morons.
Yes, good, let the projection flow through you
In addition to other points, the election machine wants it this way. Advertisers, lawyers, staff, venues, news organizations, and all the other hangers on make good money from the nonsense.
So I agree with you, changes are completely necessary. I just don't see how when the money makers pay off those who could make real changes.
It seems significant that a GOP controlled committee is looking into one of their own. If he's found in violation he should not only be removed from office, but also tried and convicted. Think he'd worry then?
Yeah like fucking off to Cancun while his constituents froze without power and in many cases, water
Fahhhcking Tim. You mean this time, Tim?
Agreed. I'm a veteran,I had a lower security clearance, and I can attest that the sheer number of times the government warns about the consequences relating to classified materials is very high. There is no question that a military member handling things as Trump did would be locked away quickly and for the long haul.
Still I hold out hope that 45 will face the consequences he's due without pardon. Otherwise it would be setting a dangerous precedent for national security, and I can't think of anything the government holds more dearly than that. Letting 45 off the hook is effectively saying they value him more than national security, no?
And like the Alabama ruling, it doesn't explain why the court nevertheless had issued emergency relief to allow Louisiana to use its unlawful maps during the 2022 midterm cycle," Vladeck added. "It puts the court's interventions last year into ever-sharper perspective.
This stands out to me as the question begging for an answer. Surely the Supreme Court will explain itself, right? Right.
So much so that he'll set aside the ethic and moral standards he and all those "God-fearing, law-abiding, patriotic people in this country" profess to uphold.