frustbox

joined 1 year ago
[–] frustbox@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

"We aim to have meaningfully fewer ads than … " That's an insanely low bar to clear. Also, I thought you already did, by having [quickly recounts using fingers] none!

They're really trying to spin this as a positive. They always tried to pull this. From the very start. "Your prime now includes Video, you didn't ask for it, but we gave it to you anyway, for free! Also Prime now costs more." And then as soon as there's finally anything interesting "Look, all the things you love are now on your free prime video - oh you want to watch that one? Sorry, that is for rent only, or you can buy it!" I don't remember how long I've been a customer, must have been 2009. Got a gift card for Christmas, I can't use it to pay because I need to verify my identity? What?!

Enshittification galore.

[–] frustbox@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

No, I think the conservative party is just too scared to touch cars.

They rolled back quite a few projects to improve cycling infrastructure, citing it's negative impact on car traffic. They'd rather see a continuation of the traffic collapse than be the ones who start all the construction and draw the wrath of car brains on them.

So to appease the people who do want more public transport, and environmentally conscious traffic, they propose some "look it's futuristic" new tech miracle solution while funneling research funds to their business buddies and thumping their patriotic chests for found something for German industry.

Because building a tram is not prestigious enough (and conflicts with the holy car).

[–] frustbox@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have a swap partition in my current system (64GB), I've had one on my previous system (which was 11 years old, with 16 GB) - I have seen my system¹ swap at most 5 times, and every time it was software misbehaving so badly that it made the system unusable.

I know this is anecdotal evidence - but my experience is that it's getting less and less relevant for most desktop systems.

Edit: ¹my old system, the new one has not swapped at all in the past year.

[–] frustbox@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (8 children)

The 2× recommendation is indeed way old, it stems from a time when computers had 1 or 2 GB of RAM or even less. Nowadays, if you have 16GB of RAM I'd say you're not going to need it (in most use cases).

Chances are your RAM will rarely get so full that your system will need to swap to disk, it's probably going to clear buffer/cached data first. This is data kept in RAM that's not actively used by the system but might be useful soon.

If your RAM does run full you either have some very specific application that demands it (then you probably already know the importance and hopefully wouldn't ask internet randos) or you have a memory leak - that's a problem and I don't believe swapping helps in this case. It's way too slow for that.

If you run VMs and reserve RAM for each those considerations might change.

Personally I don't think swap partitions are particularly useful any more, certainly not 2× your RAM. If you ever want to suspend your system, then it needs to store all your RAM content to disk and it will use your swap for it, so 1× your RAM would be required. But with modern systems and SSDs booting only takes seconds, so I don't think suspend to disk has much utility.

For me swap files are a good compromise. But if a system with 16GB starts swapping, something is not going well.