fnsv

joined 1 year ago
[–] fnsv@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

If Musk destroys Twitter, I will hang his portrait right next to Papa Stalin's in my room. Twitter delenda est.

[–] fnsv@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

SNES, then PS2. PS2 was really something else.

[–] fnsv@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Same with me. People keep gushing over this game but the combat has the worst aspects of a JRPG - different armour pools that you have to grind down before you can actually damage the enemies etc. Every fight is pretty much the same, you deal with the annoying teleporters who make having a party formation absolutely pointless and then deal with the rest. The writing is less than mediocre, the combat isn't great and I really don't understand what people are fawning over.

Sometimes it feels like if enough YouTubers hype a game, it becomes a fan favourite for some reason. Witcher 1 played just as well as Witcher 3, but for some reason the former is barely talked about.

[–] fnsv@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Depends on your specs, I guess. I have a top end GPU for the first time in my life (3rd world is tough), it's glorious seeing it in full ultra, 1440p@60FPS. If you won't be able to bruteforce it, the One X version should be fine, I guess.

[–] fnsv@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I played D2R on a Series X and the graphics really are gorgeous, but considering that it's just a layer running on top of a game that's almost a quarter century old now, I remember that it was way too demanding for what it is. It also lacks QoL options - auto pickup, a modern inventory etc.

[–] fnsv@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

D3 had a bad reputation at launch because it was a sequel to an all time classic and had very big shoes to fill, as well as RMAH, but it's an absolutely solid game now and yes, it is very well optimised