fifisaac

Maybe I misunderstood but that seemed to be what you were suggesting

So when Tories go back on promises it's lying but when labour do it its reasonable pragmatism?

Slurs against the supporters of the organisations who won workers all their rights isn't anti worker?

How about repeatedly voting on bills to reduce the rights of workers to collectively bargain for better treatment? Or does she have to shoot striking people on the picket line for you to accept she doesn't care about labour

This government don't need any more humiliation, this only humiliated Labour by having a former member of the government be allowed to sit among them

Accusing union activists who heckled her for showing up at a protest in support of P&O workers who her government failed to support of being 'hard-left militants' might be such an example

Because it is a direct contradiction for the party of workers to welcome people with anti worker views?

Maybe you're right and I hope you are, but I can't trust a 'democratic socialist' party that repeatedly turns it's back on promises to workers and allows hard right sexual assault apologists into the party

What's the point in a LABOUR government if the party is willing to take the support of people who are proudly anti-worker? What good will it do to be a government of tories with red ties?

Principles

Maybe its hard for the current labour party to understand that, but the party of the workers should not welcome hardcore right wingers no matter what the circumstances are

Insane how people are defending this just because it harms the Tories. Do labour supporters have no principles at all?

How is he wrong? She will still be a party member, she will likely still hold the housing advisory position she's been given and be out on the streets as a face of labour campaigning. No right wingers should be welcome in labour, it says 'democratic socialist' on the membership card for a reason

She already announced she won't be standing again