fedfedfedd

A rescue loan is not a loan used to build infrastructure. They’re used to cover for existing debt, not to take on new debt.

A loan with an interest rate of 5% is charity

[citation needed]

so you neither understand project funding nor interest rates

You cant even provide facts. Stop arguing in bad faith. Now go schizo post about US loans.

I love how you start using that emoji when you get frustrated.

Rescue loans are not the type of loans being used to build these railway networks lol.

Do you even know how IMF rescue loans work? Did you try Google buddy?

I wont even entertain your dumbass ramble about different countries because we arent talking about that.

https://time.com/6266658/china-emerges-major-global-lender/#:~:text=China%20typically%20offers%20rescue%20loans,the%20IMF%2C%20the%20study%20said.

First result in Google. You cant even Google so im pretty sure you dont know what the hell you are talking about lol.

Im sorry, I didnt knew you were the victim all along. I thought you were the one who is starting all the drama. My mistake. How can I make you feel better?

wish you happy seething and coping

Friendliest lemmygrad user right here.

I like how you wont comment on the maintenance contracts.

Its not an debate. I wasnt talking about other devices, you just misread it. Easy as that just move on.

I like how you ignored the part in which chinese companies force the governments to sign 90+ year maintenance contracts. Convenient as it isnt part of the loan, just part of the bribery.