essell

joined 3 months ago
[–] essell@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago

When someone explains something everyone knows or is obvious as if they just thought of it for the first time in human history.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Make the case?

I'm not campaigning.

Its art, make of it whatever you wish!

[–] essell@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

It depends on my circumstances, its adaptive.

I go to bed for the day ahead so I look at how much I've got on and when.

I find loosing sleep effects me less and less as I get older.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Seems this time we'll likely evade the resident weevil

 
[–] essell@lemmy.world -5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I suspect Kim is more focused on the political implications than the lives of the people involved.

Not everyone pretends to care about their troop's lives like some do.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (13 children)

What was the name of that episode again?

"Planet of the 80s" I think

[–] essell@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nothing in this suggests to me that he's okay with Facebook

[–] essell@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That's a car I would lose in a carpark

[–] essell@lemmy.world 10 points 2 weeks ago

Old enough that I've never seen the episode.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Dexter Morgan.

Just imagine the hugs and him murdering anyone who hurts me.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's the really stupid part of all this.

Small amount of money massive personal and political consequences. Hilariously stupid.

[–] essell@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Is enrichment turning one isotope into another or when you separate out the different isotopes?

I know Iran has centrifuge technology for this became Mossad sabotaged them a while back.

 

He wants to be a meme so much, it'll be in the manifesto

 
 
 

To elaborate...

The UK has always favoured centrist governments, when the Conservatives get too nasty they're unpopular, Labour only wins when they do Thatcherism-Light, etc.

We now have a choice between a relatively moderate conservative prime minister, who is admittedly being dragged to the right by his party and others, and a relatively moderate labour leader who has purged the extremism from his party to pursue a centre left agenda.

In both cases, what I see are two people who believe in principles, compromise them for politics sake, who are fundamentally in favour of the status quo rather than revolution and prefer to win through being seen as competent.

Fine, this has been the case most of my life. It's why I've been relaxed about politics. Whatever happens, things will largely stay the same with small incremental changes.

The difference now is about the fringes. Not a day goes by recently without a headline grabbing policy coming out of the government press machine making a virtue out of being a bunch of ****s.

The ridiculous culture war stuff, the politicisation of fear and anger. Pointless, ineffective policies that are intended to win a few votes regardless of the harm they cause. Sickening stuff a lot of the time, born out of selfishness of behalf of those in power to try and keep that power and get as much as they can for themselves. It feels like they be the ones looting the Titanic as it sank.

So whilst Labour are not likely to usher in a revolution, a golden age or fix things overnight. I'll take centrist middle aged dad running the country if it means an end to this nonsense. An end to a government attacking it's own citizens in the name of defending the people.

 
 
view more: next ›