dogmuffins

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This looks great actually. Thank you!

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

This looks really, really, great. Thank you!

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I did have a look at this, right on their front page it says "focal board is now mattermost boards" or something, this one in particular really does look like part of a larger ecosystem. Even the github repo is being retired as it's being merged into mattermost server or something.

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's as though this proposal was dreamed up by someone who has never installed anything on their PC.

Like are they going to block entire repositories? When you apt get install x from within france to they expect repositories to magically give you the french version?

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You don't even need to do that though. It would be the "fork" that contains the blocking, surely.

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Weird take.

So adapt to some specific one

I guess I'm asking for recommendations as to which will be the easiest to adapt to.

 

I'm part of a small team that collaborates on projects. There's up to 50 projects in the queue or in progress at a time, all projects are very similar to one another.

We basically need some kind of task management platform with the following features:

  • tasks need to be grouped by project
  • we need to be able to discuss tasks
  • we need to be able to attach a few files (mostly screen shots) to discussions

That's it really, but everything I've looked at seems to be either a kanban board which just doesn't work for us, or a small part of a larger project management / collaboration ecosystem which is kind of overwhelming.

We're presently using Asana, but while it does what we need IMO it does it very poorly - better suited to teams working on fewer more variable projects.

Of course I'd prefer self hosted & open source but that's not critically important.

Any suggestions welcome!

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this really true?

Twilio is the biggest sms back end and it's like $10 per number month or something.

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Australia also, South West corner. Water is fine to drink, I just don't like the taste. We collect rain water instead - heaps of that.

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

The bulk of reddit has already gone back to reddit.

Don't get me wrong, lemmy is great just the way it is. We don't need a continued influx from reddit (although lets see what happens on 1 July).

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Quantum Radio by A.G. Riddle.

Similar style to Bobiverse books. I dig it. Listening on audiobookshelf too!

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

What about bots to talk to the bots thought?

[–] dogmuffins@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

syntax error, malformed JSON.

 

I'm just wondering if there's any strategy to link to a post in an instance agnostic kind of way.

Take for example this post which originates in !lemmy@lemmy.ml.

If someone sent me that link but I did not have a lemmy.ml account, then I can read it but not participate.

If I have an account at lemmy.world then it's not trivial to find that post on that instance. I can't just edit the url because the post ID is not the same. I'd have to navigate to lemmy.world/c/lemmy@lemmy.ml and find the post from that feed. This might be possible for recent posts but becomes very difficult with any posts even a little stale.

My understanding of "how lemmy works" is very naive, but I assume it's not possible to generate UUIDs for posts. That being the case you'd need separate lookup servers that maintain lists of urls for posts and can translate between them.

 

While I'm not interested in encouraging /r/selfhosted users to leave reddit, I thought it would be good to have some discussion around the possibilities for a selfhosted community on lemmy.

It looks as though most users are washing up in !selfhosted@lemmy.ml, but this is but a temporary refuge in these troubled times. The single mod is not responsive, lemmy.ml is already struggling with load, and the background lemmy.ml community may not be right for us. If we set up shop here we're just going to have to move, probably sooner rather than later.

So if we move, do we create our own instance or move to an existing one better aligned with our needs?

Given that there don't seem to be any instances which are really ideal, the remaining advantages to choosing an existing instance is simply that we rely on someone else's infrastructure (and the associated time, skill, and responsibility). This is a significant advantage which makes this option tough to pass up, but the equally significant disadvantage is that we don't get our own place. It's like renting a room in a frat house rather than building our own mansion.

The remaining option is to create our own instance. If we were to go this route, in my opinion it is critically important that the responsibility for this be shared amongst several people. This dramatically reduces the odds that someone loses interest, or lacks the resources to support the community long term. While I'm certain that everyone in this sub could spin up an instance, we all know that providing high availability to potentially thousands of users is not something to be undertaken on a whim. There's a significant risk to the community in allowing someone to take this on themselves.

I think fosstodon (mastodon) with several admins is a good model of how something like this can work. I also think it would be a good idea to broaden the subject to FOSS rather than merely self hosting.

So the questions are...

Do you think we should create & support a community on an existing instance, or create our own instance?

If an existing instance then which one?

If a new instance then how would you like to see it operated?

view more: next ›