In this case having more browser engines not under Google's control is probably a good thing. Although this effort might've been better spent working on Servo.
decivex
You don't really get the personal touch there though.
I think it's most likely pressure from payment processors.
I know I'm being somewhat pedantic but range() returns an iterable range
type, not a list, in python 3.
Make your own rules.
list.append
returnsNone
so what you've actually got is a list comprehension that generates a list containing the valueNone
19 times. (using functions with side effects, such aslist.append
, in list comprehensions are generally bad style so you should avoid this)- The
list[...]
syntax retrieves elements from the list, which is not what you're trying to do here. (and it is actually invalid syntax in this case) - You should generally avoid calling lists
list
, because list is already a builtin.
If you want to append the numbers 1 to 19 to a list as you're trying to do you can call the list.extend
function with the list comprehension [value for value in range(1, 20)]
as the argument. (Although in this case you can also just use the range directly.) To do it without list comprehensions you can simply loop over the range and repeatedly call the append function.
Thanks! I just won the game!
It's not a paper, it's a stream-of-consciousness style blog post.
Yes, I simplified for the sake of brevity. But you're reading a lot into their comments that just isn't there. Yes they were running interference for a nazi (and not making a particularly compelling case) but there's nothing to indicate it was intentional. (It's not a strawman argument either btw, unless you're claiming they intentionally ignored the boogaloo reference rather than just not knowing about them.)
Edit: Also I don't think not making assumptions about someone's motivations is the same thing as 'putting faith' in them.
No, but it is primarily a white supremacists movement and the '88' on the license plate kinda takes away all doubt.
The engine is where like 95% of the complexity lies though. Maybe more.