decivex

joined 8 months ago
[–] decivex@yiffit.net 1 points 5 days ago

The engine is where like 95% of the complexity lies though. Maybe more.

[–] decivex@yiffit.net 15 points 5 days ago

In this case having more browser engines not under Google's control is probably a good thing. Although this effort might've been better spent working on Servo.

[–] decivex@yiffit.net 1 points 1 week ago

You don't really get the personal touch there though.

[–] decivex@yiffit.net 3 points 1 week ago (5 children)

I think it's most likely pressure from payment processors.

[–] decivex@yiffit.net 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I know I'm being somewhat pedantic but range() returns an iterable range type, not a list, in python 3.

[–] decivex@yiffit.net 3 points 1 week ago

Make your own rules.

[–] decivex@yiffit.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
  1. list.append returns None so what you've actually got is a list comprehension that generates a list containing the value None 19 times. (using functions with side effects, such as list.append, in list comprehensions are generally bad style so you should avoid this)
  2. The list[...] syntax retrieves elements from the list, which is not what you're trying to do here. (and it is actually invalid syntax in this case)
  3. You should generally avoid calling lists list, because list is already a builtin.

If you want to append the numbers 1 to 19 to a list as you're trying to do you can call the list.extend function with the list comprehension [value for value in range(1, 20)] as the argument. (Although in this case you can also just use the range directly.) To do it without list comprehensions you can simply loop over the range and repeatedly call the append function.

[–] decivex@yiffit.net 6 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Thanks! I just won the game!

[–] decivex@yiffit.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's not a paper, it's a stream-of-consciousness style blog post.

[–] decivex@yiffit.net 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Yes, I simplified for the sake of brevity. But you're reading a lot into their comments that just isn't there. Yes they were running interference for a nazi (and not making a particularly compelling case) but there's nothing to indicate it was intentional. (It's not a strawman argument either btw, unless you're claiming they intentionally ignored the boogaloo reference rather than just not knowing about them.)

Edit: Also I don't think not making assumptions about someone's motivations is the same thing as 'putting faith' in them.

[–] decivex@yiffit.net 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, but it is primarily a white supremacists movement and the '88' on the license plate kinda takes away all doubt.

view more: next ›