@dessalines@lemmy.ml is clearly actually a caring mod. Not an enlightened Centrist.
daelphinux
joined 3 years ago
Don't know if you speak German: In modern parlance, mitlaeufer is used to refer to people who are unwilling to take a stand and "run with" whoever seems to be louder or has more potential for power. Traditionally, it referred to those who went along with the Nazis just to get a little benefit for themselves or out of fear.
Is it fear? Or selfishness driving your desire to mitlaeuf?
"Let both sides have a voice, we can't tell anti-vaxxers and those with views that are actually and tangibly dangerous when they spread not to have a voice! Next up: A live reading of Chairman Mao's first 5 year plan, followed by the diaries of Generalissimo Franco!"
Said every mitlaufer ever.
What caused his death? Was it cytokine storm brought on by vaccine affect? Could it have been Guillan-Barre? Do you know what the risk of autoantibody development leading to long term rheumatological issues in treatment of COVID-19 is?
I've been doing a study whereby I look at the ACE impacts of COVID-19 prime and how those might be suspect in neurological affect from long-COVID. Do you have any insight into how an endothelial virus with limited primary neurological impact could lead to lasting affect? You seem to have done your research well. I could use a fellow researcher to bounce ideas off of.
Also, given that your assertions imply that you have substantial knowledge of this case whereby a gentleman took the COVID-19 vaccine and then died, do you have any pre-publication work I could see on the event? It's questionable to me how this chain of events took place.
Your argument is based on Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc: After an event therefore because of an event. It's a logical fallacy specifically designed for warning people that just because Event A happens and is directly followed by Event B doesn't mean Event A caused Event B.
Dunno why we're explaining this though, if there was any propensity for scientific thought present here we wouldn't be having the argument in the first place.
#OwnTheLibs #DieForTheEconomy /s
I like the idea of having a 12 volt subsystem that's automated by it's own self-contained controller in my house to use from Solar instead of the 120.
But like, door locks and shit? For that I quote Admiral Adama "It's an integrated computer network, and I will not have it aboard this ship."
The point is to make a system that's better than capitalism... not reduce to that level. Because, what you just described sounds like shareware with extra steps.
For real, every time I see this I have to applaud you a little bit more.
I think that the focus on NFT's being unbreakable, and not that uniqueness, is the only part where I even begin to have some semblance of disagreeing with you, and that is entirely a position of perspective.
That's just T.A.T.U
The FSF endorses Fritzing, which does exactly what I was saying, as an example.
So, I wrote my master's thesis on cybersecurity education, and how it's generally fucked.
3 years into the field post-thesis and we're more fucked than we were before.
This guy knows what's up. Especially in the US there is absolutely no chance for cybersecurity. There was, CMMC V1 was a good step in the right direction. But a few organizations (including the 2 that caused us to need CMMC in the first place) removeded and moaned about implementation cost and the government backed right the fuck off. Cybersecurity is a lost cause, and usually the people working in it are only there for the money.
The people learning it all seem to think it's their big break to making boatloads of bank. It's not. It's a big break to a lot of nights not sleeping, reading logs, doing pen tests, consulting on compliance, or whatever job you get. You're going to be underpaid, overworked, and everything will be your fault somehow.
Vaccine limits transmissibility of the virus by reducing viral load; imagine being so ignorant you think that a vaccine is a 100% catch all. The Non-vaccinated should get a UBI like everyone else should, they should also be staying home to reduce risk to themselves and others (limiting exposure to a virus is just a good idea in general: the vaccinated should do it to). The fact that capitalism doesn't let them stay home and wallow in their own ignorance is not my problem. I never called for the sanctioning or removal of the unvaccinated from society.