countablenewt

joined 6 months ago
[–] countablenewt@allthingstech.social -1 points 2 months ago (11 children)

@zbyte64 you’re getting away from the original conversation

[–] countablenewt@allthingstech.social -3 points 2 months ago (13 children)

@zbyte64 with everything you see you are scraping data from your environment whether you want to or not

How does a child learn what pain is? How does a teenager learn what heartbreak is? It’s certainly not because they made the decision to find that out themselves

@Subverb that is, quite impressively, the opposite of what I said

Is a person infringing on copyright by producing content? No. It’s about intent and scale. Humans don’t just sit on this knowledge, they do something with it

There is nothing illegal about WHAT it’s doing, there is everything illegal about HOW and WHY

I very clearly stated that OpenAI’s intent and their scale at which they operate are blatant copyright infringement and that it has been backed up with decades of precedents

[–] countablenewt@allthingstech.social 4 points 2 months ago (17 children)

@Pika @flop_leash_973 This is largely my thoughts on the whole thing, the process of actually training the AI is no different from a human learning

The thing about that, is that there's likely enough precedent in copyright law to actually handle that, with most copyright law it's all about intent and scale and I think that's likely where this will all go

Here the intent is to replace and the scale is astronomical, whereas an individual's intent is to add and the scale is minimal

[–] countablenewt@allthingstech.social 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@Navigator @vzq That should probably be the first question then

[–] countablenewt@allthingstech.social 0 points 5 months ago (6 children)

@neme I like how the devs were like “eh, it’s not even that good of an app, whatever”

view more: ‹ prev next ›