No, it's not wishing harm, it's wishing to prevent future harm to innocent bystanders.
He wasn't doing donuts in the parking lot, or some other relatively isolated teenage idiocy.
He was engaging in behavior that could have easily killed an entire family who just happened to be on the road with him. Considering he comes from wealth, and walked away unscathed, I doubt any lesson was learned, because that's what history shows us.
Because of that, the odds are high that this won't be the last time he takes the lives of innocent bystanders into his hands for hearts and likes.
I'm sure when we read the article in 6 months how he mowed down a mother and three kids while live streaming, you will still feel the same way.
Okay ... All of that could be true, and then some, and it still wouldn't give the DMCA any legal jurisdiction in Germany, or Mexico, or anywhere else that isn't America..
Is this thread about some moral invective? Or is it about the DMCA?