cerberus

joined 1 year ago
[–] cerberus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Yes I understand and agree that this is not the right path to take.

Automation however is inevitable. There is proven tech that’s existed for decades, the only new things being added here are taxiing, takeoff and landing (and honestly takeoff and landing are already automated, they’re just not used as much)

[–] cerberus@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (7 children)

Considering most all commercial flights are fly by wire except for taxi, takeoff, and landing… not sure

[–] cerberus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Had a stroke you mean?

[–] cerberus@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you, like me, read this exchange and are curious, 88 = HH = nazi

If you need more explanation I can supply it.

[–] cerberus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I remember mudkips

[–] cerberus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

5 tons you say?

[–] cerberus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh ok so you’re more so working with folder structure etc, so bash for when you plug-in a card?

I’m thinking in more programmatic terms, there’s definitely some bash scripting you can execute. Or just go balls out and write a service that executes on systemctl

[–] cerberus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can you give more context, what are you using? Language / system / etc?

[–] cerberus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I will agree it’s a valid storage but it has to be specified in ms

[–] cerberus@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago (11 children)

ISO 8601 is amazing for data storage and standardizing the date.

Display purposes sure, whatever you feel like

But goddammit if you don’t use ISO 8601 to store dates, I will find you, and I will standardize your code.

[–] cerberus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh fuck we’re in a recursion meme

 
 
 
 
 
 
126
Abuttus (i.imgur.com)
 
491
Haha (i.imgur.com)
 
 
492
Guacamole (i.imgur.com)
 
277
slaps hood (i.imgur.com)
 
178
Woosh! (i.imgur.com)
 
view more: next ›