I skipped a lot in the middle/bottom. I was mainly looking for what the main PG maintainers wrote. Mull isn't a new app. There was a big discussion around it in autumn and over the years as well. Including mull was mostly carefully thought through, like it was when brave got a recommendation. The voices were loud after brave was added. For me, there's no risk in using mull and I'm glad that it's recognized as a good browser although the "risk" title should just be a "warning" instead.
barbara
joined 2 years ago
That issue is closed and the description is rewritten but mull stays https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/commit/1ce99410188a6af7a1cbe578ac072e83f77edd2d
It's now written as if it was dangerous to use mull which isn't but it's better than not recommending it at all. Mull is a great browser even though it's missing per site process isolation. It just doesn't pose a threat to most people.
Missing this feature likely won't pose an issue for low-risk web browsers who keep their browser up-to-date ...
You can use any text editor, e.g. kate, open a terminal and use typst watch document.typ or simply typst w document.typ and have any pdf viewer at the side. It'll auto update the new output in real time.
Your screenshot actually shows the webeditor of typst.
This is the app you shared:
The web app is not open source. If you want multi user collaboration, use another text editor.
Warum ist sowas nicht in der Verfassung geregelt?
That's great. Kudos!
Currently, it is a little bit difficult to find. There is an android and a different ios marknote app. KDE's marknote app still has few stars on github
Yes. I trust and support KDE