asbestos

joined 1 year ago
[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

True, but why shouldn’t we have more options?

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 49 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

smh the “i” is missing

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 43 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

my drunk ass is unable to understand this right now

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 9 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

…Voron? 😔 Sorry

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Smaller overall size of the phone. If the folded thickness is less than a double of the current slabs, and the unfolded size is bigger than them, doesn’t it make sense to you?
With the “current” technology, we could make phones that have 9” screens and insane battery life (The ratio of screen power usage and battery density isn’t 1:1. Think tablets and their insanely good battery life) but it would be impractical, but if you fold them, you get that exact thing.

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Bro why are you only posting gizmochina articles?

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I’d take a foldable over the current slabs any day of the week

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago

proper cunts

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 8 points 5 days ago (6 children)
[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It isn’t but I don’t think that was specifically the point

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Excellent read

[–] asbestos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What I meant was everybody who has access to the sky. If you live in the city, you can travel a relatively short distance from it to see the sky, but you can’t avoid starlink satellites no matter where you are.
Mainly, I meant us who go out at night with their telescopes and adapters for DSLR cameras to take stacked long exposures of all the cool things we can see from our pale blue dot.

The lights you refer to are millions of different municipalities ordering street lights designed with zero consideration for the light pollution they might produce. It’s a huge problem with no easy fix on a global level while starlink is literally just one company launching a shitload of satellites. What exactly makes you believe I’m not “rallying” against light pollution?
And yes, I’m aware our space pollution is already insane but people wouldn’t complain this much if starlinks didn’t travel at a much closer distance to us (and thus and block more view) and if they weren’t launched in such huge numbers in a short amount of time.
Now that I think about it, what the fuck are you even saying? That this is good and we should launch more starlink satellites? That the situation is already that bad that we shoudn’t give a shit?

 

I know it's been a running joke for years now, but jesus christ the iPhones still start at 128GB and the regular 16 is still 60Hz and USB 2.0.

 

Is there any hope for us to be able to play videos again? It’s been months now, and as far as I can tell, the service has been off-line more than it has been online, no matter which instance I use.

 

RARBG shutting down left a huge hole for me and I can’t figure out what’s a good alternative for it other than 1337. Any suggestions?

view more: next ›