It’s a UI design tool. It’s what UI and UX designers use to create mockups that are then given to frontend programmers to implement.
anlumo
joined 1 year ago
Patenting obvious solutions is done all the time and perfectly fine from a legal point of view.
I’ve also heard the theory that eyes need ultraviolet light to grow properly, which is missing in artificial lighting.
Yes, but that's not how it works in practice. Running a government is a huge money-making machine, and so it attracts the worst kind of people.
Of course they are in it for the money, what do you think?
Probably a lot longer. These SCOTUS decrees will last until the US crumbles to dust.
Although, they might have accellerated the timeline towards the end significantly.
That’s intentional. Apple knows they won’t win in the long run, so their strategy is to delay the change for as long as possible.
They didn’t need the army of lawyers to get license deals, so that’s not a fair comparison.
The only result of such a resolution would be that China, India and Russia would be the only countries with nukes in space.
Might be intentional, recently Apple went the direction of silently dropping features in updates.
Interesting that Chinese optometrists don’t use characters for these tests. With Chinese characters it'd probably be too unreliable I guess.