No, not every company can afford to Bulldoze the competition in the Browser Market because they have indefinite deep pockets from the Ad Business.
If that unfair advantage goes away there will be more competition again in the Browser Segment .
Also Marketshare can grow and shrink quick
Google can Set Standards to their own Advantage, e.g. with regards to Tracking which reinforces their Monopoly on Things Like Ads, the Same reason they crippled all the AdBlockers with ManifestV3 on Chromium-based Browsers
And the only alternative that isn't Chromium-based is Firefox. (Or Safari with WebKit). All other Browsers use Chromium
So it would be really good for everyone if they were forced to sell Chrome
It's possible, but Not necessary. The Plugin includes a client
But they include it, as I've written it 🙄
(They pool multiple shadow libraries)
BiglyBT includes an embedded I2P-Client
There are already Torrents with the raw data and they've used IPFS in the past, but decided it was not ready https://annas-archive.org/torrents (They pool multiple shadow libraries)
Why didn't they use Bollards? It's pretty much standard nowadays.
At this point it's just negligent not to use them for christmas markets or other big gatherings
The Implementation Sucks
Android Beam was so much nicer to use
Android Beam was so much cooler and easier to use than Quick Share
I honestly don't See the Relation to Chrome.
You're suggesting that a PWA running on Firefox isn't suitable for this?