VerPoilu

joined 1 year ago
[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago

For that they use iframes, which have a different security system.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Because of the CORS settings on Google's servers would tell your browser to not go forward with the request. There are two ways it could eventually be possible:

  • By opening the video in a new page/tab that only contains the video, with the YouTube player, which defeats the purpose a bit.
  • By installing an addon or an app on your device.
[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

Fair enough, that's interesting. I assume this only applies to the non-web clients. On the web, it would not be possible. You can verify by looking at the outgoing network requests on this random video for example: https://invidious.privacyredirect.com/watch?v=qKMcKQCQxxI

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz -5 points 4 days ago (6 children)

I'm pretty confident that you are wrong.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 31 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Invidious and YouTube piped (and LibreTube) by default load the videos server-side, as opposed to GrayJay, NewPipe or Smarttube.

It has advantages (mostly that your IP address is not shared with YouTube, and it allows users from countries where YouTube is blocked to still access it) and inconvenients (much harder to keep up when YouTube actively seeks to block them).

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Smarttube next doesn't require rooting the device, it can be sideloaded. Sideloading is not very complicated. Google is not trying to block any sideloading (at the moment, at least).

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

You can download videos and cut off sponsored moments in the video with sponsorblock.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

GrayJay is pretty good!

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 1 points 3 months ago

Alternatively, in a similar fashion. Use "hail" to auto pause any app you want so they don't run in the background unintended.

https://f-droid.org/en/packages/com.aistra.hail/

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 9 points 3 months ago

Firefox's implementation of manifest v3 doesn't come with the same restriction as Google's. Ad blockers will still work with manifest v3 on Firefox (but not on chrome).

This means that all manifest v3 extensions made for Chrome work with Firefox, and almost all manifest v3 extensions made for Firefox will work with Chrome.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They already support manifest v3, but with less restrictions than Chrome's implementation.

[–] VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Firefox's implementation of manifest v3 is a bit different than Chrome's, and still allows for blocking webrequests with no upper limit.

https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2024/03/13/manifest-v3-manifest-v2-march-2024-update/

https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2022/05/18/manifest-v3-in-firefox-recap-next-steps/

1
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by VerPoilu@sopuli.xyz to c/piped@feddit.rocks
 

Hello,

I would like to self host either on my machine, or on a raspberry pi. I don't absolutely need to access it from outside my network, but it would be a plus. I have read this page: https://docs.piped.video/docs/self-hosting/ , but I'm a bit lost on how to set up hostnames. Maybe I can use something like DuckDNS: https://www.duckdns.org/

view more: next ›