TonoManza

joined 1 month ago
[–] TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 3 weeks ago (20 children)

To quote him: "“From the start, Harris has worked to tie Israel’s hand behind its back, demanding an immediate ceasefire, always demanding ceasefire".

Okay? Do you usually treat what Trump says as gospel? ...Do you think she got a ceasefire or successfully restrained Israels genocidal ambitions so far?

Materially, what is the difference between them.

"Genocide but sad" vs "Genocide and happy", I'm not choosing Genocide period.

However bad things currently are, Trump's openly-stated position that horrific situation is that Israel needs to go in harder.

Things are genocide, Harris' openly stated positions are horrific and enabling of a genocide we have seen be carried out.

Kamala Harris is actively engaging in genocide and it's worked for over a year, you're engaging in hypotheticals on it getting worse based off Trump's words. Perhaps Trump's incompetence would even lead to a forced end to the genocide if we are engaging in hypotheticals, in fact, I'd wager thats much more likely than Harris suddenly switching from a genocider to a compassionate human being and ending it.

[–] TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml 34 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (23 children)

Because why would a pro-Palestine person vote for the person who has aided the genocide against them and continues to vow further support for the regime responsible?

The way I see it, the USA has a two party system and in the next few weeks they’re either going to have Trump or Harris as president, come inauguration day. With this in mind doesn’t it make sense to vote for the person least likely to escalate the situation even more.

How is Kamala less likely to escalate it further when she has supported the actual ongoing genocide? What will Trump escalate it to? Double genocide? Either way I'm not voting for Trump so I don't have to agree with his policies. I'm just not going to let the Dems conduct Genocide and scare me into agreeance with them using the threat of Trump.

If you're talking about escalation with Iran, we have already been working with Israel for a "response" to Iran response and she has again supported Israels right to continue their provocations in the name of "defense".

Giving your vote to an independent or worse not voting at all, just gives more of a chance for Trump to win the election and then who knows what crazy stuff he will allow, or encourage, Israel to get away with.

Crazy stuff like genocide? Expanding the "war" in Gaza into Lebanon? Provoking Iran with a strike on their soil then planning "retaliation" for their retaliation?

As sure nobody wants to vote for a party allowing these heinous crimes to be committed, but given you’re getting one of them shouldn’t you be voting for the one that will be the least horrible of the two.

Kamala is actively engaged in a genocide. There should be punishments for this. The least of which should be losing your role in any sort of elected office. A vote for Kamala is literally a vote saying that you are okay with genocide as long as it benefits you to do so.

[–] TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 3 weeks ago

Amazing how someone will equate an imperfect country and THE genocidal slaveholder regime.

Nobody says China is perfect. We claim that the US and their allies have no right to criticize. It's like the Nazis/Axis powers criticizing the USSR (or Sweden or whatever since you probably support and parrot Nazi propaganda against USSR)

[–] TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You say this while America has the largest prison population in the world, filled with a large percentage of black men, who are used as slave labour and as America carries out a literal Genocide against Palestine.

China is infinitely better than the US on Muslim and minorities rights.

[–] TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml 18 points 3 weeks ago

Every search engine ever is biased in the results it will show you.

You have to learn the biases and not fall prey to them.

If you think you're using an unbiased source then all you've done is failed to recognize them.

[–] TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 3 weeks ago

Well, the US says they can still do that for the next 21 days before there will be any repurcussions (please ignore that this conveniently places it a week after the US election so they can comfortably do nothing)

[–] TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

At this point, the very few games that I am leaving behind are only the ones that use anticheat systems that do not work with linux, and I don't think I'll really miss letting a game company rootkit my macine

League of Legends continues to kill my hopes and dreams. Legitimately the only game I care about keeping access to and there's no way vanguard works when it barely works on windows.

[–] TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Harris likes:

She says silly things in between vowing to continue genocide and feeding anti-immigrant rhetoric.

Her winning would ensure Hillary can never be the first female president.

She kicked Biden out of the race.

Trump dislikes:

Almost all of his policies and rhetoric.

He's old and kinda losing his funny/charm skill.

Elon Musk.

(There's a 0% chance I vote for Harris and a 1% chance I vote for Trump depending on how accelerationist/spiteful towards America I'm feeling in the booth)

[–] TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

For reciprocal holidays like Christmas, giving cash maybe gets a little too close to exposing the pointlessness. I give you cash, then you give me cash, what are we doing here? And what if I gave you less than you gave me?

How does a gift card solve this though?

I give you Starbucks™ cash and you give me Chipotle™ cash. What are we doing here? What if I gave you more Starbucks™ cash then you gave me Chipotle™ cash?

It's literally just money with brand loyalty.

[–] TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago

It's the middle thing between not gifting something specific but also no just giving money.

It's literally just branded money.

[–] TonoManza@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Ah, i had the vibes from the post that it was a textbook case of "the most offensive thing you can call a racist is racist".

view more: ‹ prev next ›