Why "clearly no"?
TonoManza
joined 1 month ago
Isn't that more of a Twitch thing?
Why wouldn't you? Do you not like the content you find on it? If not, why are you thinking of downloading it?
I don't know if it shows or not, but if it can effect the results you should probably inform the doctor of the potentially warped results so they can adjust expectations accordingly (assuming you live in a place it is safe to do so, maybe not in the Philippines)
I'd go back 30 seconds before you hit submit on this question and take your keyboard away from you.
Seriously, this is a comment that's essentially "waaa I didn't like this" which has been posted by toddlers, argued by narcissists, fantasized and written about in countless comments and displayed in posts and videos around the planet.
What on earth did you think this comment would add to the fabric of society?
(from the west obviously)
Big fan of the Kentler Project?
Sheikh Shaquille O'Neil says: "they will enter vertical, but they will leave horizontal"
I'm not even saying Biden or Harris are holding Israel back. I'm saying Trump has openly stated that he wants to push Israel even further than it is already going.
Yes, you are repeatedly stating this while seemingly ignoring that Kamala and Biden are already doing genocide, because it doesn't get worse than that. If Kamala isn't stopping the genocide or even holding Israel back, how will Trump be worse? What could Trump possibly do that's worse than genocide? "Finish the job" vs "finish the job faster", either way the same result, genocide.
As I stated in my last message, if Trump gets in and starts directing Israel how to do the genocide and demands they do it faster, there's a real chance his incompetence leads to its failure. Whereas under Kamala Biden it's already been ongoing for over a year.
If we have to choose between "slow effective genocide" vs "fast sloppy genocide" I'm choosing the sloppy one. As it has the best chance of failing. (I don't support this argument of choosing a "lesser genocide" though, just stating the flaws in your argument).
Considering you apparently didn't read what I actually wrote and instead chose to insult me over something you made up
They most likely insulted you because they read what you wrote, the same reason I didn't respond initially.
Your entire previous reply to me is ignoring context almost to the point of strawmanning and borderline genocide denial*. It comes off as someone who doesn't actually care about the issue and just wants to get their talking points out about why genocidal Trump is bad and genocidal Democrats are good.
*edit for clarification: the "Trump would do it faster" is an echo of the "it's not a genocide because they could destroy Palestine anytime and haven't" form of denialism
Heat death of the universe though 🥶🥶🥶