ThomasLadder_69

joined 1 year ago
[–] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 minutes ago

the graph is clearly just fitted to the data

That's the problem. It's heavily skewed when compared to the greater overall engagement statistics.

[–] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 minutes ago

Care to elaborate?

[–] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Am i weird if i tighten bolts by moving my fingers up/down intsead of side to side?

[–] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago

Im gonna start calling him Elmo from now on haha.

[–] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Im not justifying it. In fact, I said that I didn't agree with it. All I'm saying is that in some situations, this shouldn't affect your decision if the car feels right for you. Like other commenters have pointed out, most major manufacturers are pulling the same BS (Which obviously doesn't make it OK) But the free 3 year trial makes it less of a sore spot for some.

Also, there are plenty of aftermarket remote start systems that you could install if you dont want to deal with the expensive OEM solution. This is the case for the majority of additions anyway.

Again, it's not okay, I think it's absolute BS that you have to pay any sort of subscription on a 5-figure purchase, but thinking pragmatically, there are plenty of situations where this is irrelevant.

[–] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That sir is a swan

E: could also be a goose

[–] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 29 points 3 months ago (5 children)

As someone who sells both the ecotanks are good, but you dont quite get the yield they promise upfront.

Because the ink has to travel all the way from the reservoir at the front of the printer to the print head, there is much more distance that the ink has to travel, giving it more opportunity to dry out. To combat this, ecotanks need to purge much more frequently than traditional inkjets that mount the cartridges next to the print head. This requires shooting a lot of the ink through the lines at high speed/pressure in turn wasting ink.

Also, once this cleaning cycle has been run enough times, you need to replace the ink pad that absorbs all the ink used to clean out the printer. (Only costs 10 bucks)

All of this said, I still recommend them to folks who need to print photos at home, as their color accuracy is impressive for a CMYK printer, and while the yield isn't as high as they claim, it is still much cheaper per page than most other inkjets. But more often than not, I try to convince people to just get a monochrome Brother and use a printing service/shop that has a multi-thousand dollar photo printer when they need photos.