I think they're feeling optimistic about it if they're including him. Otherwise I can easily see them replacing him and inserting the new actor into the already shot footage, like how Ridley Scott did when he replaced Kevin Spacey in All the Money in the World.
It's lightly criticizes and gleefully satires the real world's patriarchal structure, so some people (the vast majority being right-leaning men) are saying it's anti men and supports misandry. It definitely isn't and doesn't though.
It's truly got some of the worst cgi I've seen in a big budget movie in a long time. The babies in the beginning looked cursed, the time travel sequences looked like they were made up of wax figures, Batman's movements sometimes looked like they came from a late 00s video game cutscene, Zod's face looked like a bad deepfake most of the time and all the cameos at the climax were so badly executed the cgi was more noticable to me than the cameos themselves.
I'm on a much smaller scale and only oversee two mailrooms but when my dept head was looking for a place to use as storage and suggested one afternoon to use the "empty space" in the mailroom, I had to gently explain to him that the empty space was where the hundreds of boxes that we get every morning go.
I mean, people seem to have liked the Diablo 2 remaster, along with both StarCraft games. So I'm excited to check those out.
LOVE the splayed whiskers.
I was thinking the same exact thing. This looks to be based on John Cassaday's redesign from 2004 and that one leaves his forearms bare.
That's would probably be the best circle jerk in the world, but you've got send everyone underage out of the room to play Minecraft together or some shit
Excellent framing here. I love how the sunbeam bleeds into the clouds towards the right, so close to one of the mountain's peaks.
Alpaca superiority on display. Thick but also fineeeee.