TheLadyAugust

joined 1 year ago
[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think you've just described an Alzheimer's care center. Buwhahah. Honestly appropriate.

[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

An extremely common weapon is just whatever paper you can get your hands on, rolled up really really tight and folded over. You use it like a knife, targeting the neck or soft spots. I don't think it's used with intent to kill usually.

[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

I agree with your analysis of her apology. I don't think I've ever considered what makes an apology sound genuine. I've always thought of it as a gut instinct. Thank you!

Do you think that the publicity from this statement, would make a second, more genuine attempt at an apology sound like attention seeking? I wonder what kind actions she could actually take to mitigate some of the damage she's caused. That's a rhetorical question, I think.

[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Out of curiosity, what would accountability look like to you, in this case. Since she's admitted guilt she's likely to be held at least partially responsible for the crimes of others if it's found her racist claim played a part in the crimes motivation. I assume she's likely to lose her job as well, but we'll have to wait and see i suppose.

[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The difference is this would be legal.

There's no difference with a broken court and we can't fix that with our current Congress.

I know you're arguing against fixing stuff,

What the hell are you on about about? Like actually what. You need to call down with that nonsense. Why are you being so combative? I'm not even the person you were first talking to.

[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

To my knowledge there has never been a federal judge removed in anyway other than impeachment. You would have to take an untested claim to court, prove it, then still to apply that process to remove judges case by case after. Unfortunately, it's not us that gets to decide whether or not something is legal, it's up to the "supreme" Court. I just can't see us convincing 6 of those justices to accept consequences for their and their party's actions. This would be a hell of a legal long shot.

[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

They probably mean that we're still not targeting the right people. Well, all of the right people. Millionaires are definitely still on that list.

[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Lich king is where I stopped. But once they started adding in all the heirloom gear in all the benefits for super easy casual players the game stopped being as fun. I'm saying this is someone who is a casual player too. It lost all challenge. I'd be fine with the dungeon queue system, if you at least had to be in the area of the dungeon.

[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Alternatively, and possibly almost as useful, companies will end up training their AI to detect AI content so that they don't train on AI content. Which would in turn would give everyone a tool to filter out AI content. Personally, I really like the apps that poison images when they're uploaded to the internet.

[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I believe it's Chad and Stacy

[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

You shouldn't just be voting for the presidency and I mean, while you're there you may as well for no extra effort. But otherwise, The popular vote helps show the opinion of the majority. It might feel like a drop in the ocean, but every ocean is made of drops.

[–] TheLadyAugust@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm fine with just the security updates until 2025. I'm sure I'll eventually be able to move on to Linux by then.

 

This question inspired by this post..

view more: next ›