TechLich

joined 1 year ago
[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 35 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (3 children)

Hmmm...

That looks pretty paywally to me. That said, I'm all for people supporting independent media.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

This is called "semantic satiation" which are both pleasingly weird words now that I think about it...

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't think that's how it works? It's the client application that has the key for the end to end encryption, not the server. I don't think you need to trust the matrix server you use? I could be wrong, I don't know matrix particularly well.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, that's fair enough, though I'm not sure it's very different from malicious instances creating normal user accounts?

You can see when users from an instance are all suspiciously voting the same way at the same time regardless of whether they are usernames or IDs.

There's lots of legitimate users that only vote but never post so doing it based on that doesn't seem very effective?

The second problem is solved using public key cryptography, the same way that you can't impersonate someone else's username to post comments. Votes and comments are digitally signed (There would need to be a different public key for voting to maintain pseudonymity though).

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

How about pseudonymous as a compromise? Votes could be publicly federated but tied to some uuid instead of the username. That way you still have the same anti spam ability (can see that a user upvoted these things from this instance at this time) but can't tie it directly to comments or actual user accounts without some extra osint.

It might be theoretically possible to correlate the uuids with an account's activity and dox the user in some cases, especially with some instances having a single user, but it would be very difficult or impossible to do on larger instances and would add an extra layer. Single user instances would be kind of impossible to make totally private anyway because they can be identified by instance.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

It does sound very strange. What kind of anti-China content would ever help a student's application process? Most of the application documents are about things like English language competency, visa requirements and prior qualifications, not political opinions.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 26 points 4 weeks ago

The most popular brand of matches in Denmark is called Tordenskjold. In the late 1800s, Sweden had a large export production of matches, so a Danish manufacturer put Tordenskiold's portrait on his matchbox in 1882, in the hope he could once more strike at the Swedish (Danish: give de svenske stryg).[13] The Tordenskjold brand was bought by a Swedish company in 1972.[14]

Ouch.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 69 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It's not that it's on the 172.16.0.0/12 range. That's totally normal and used for all kinds of stuff.

It's that it's in 172.16.42.0/24 which is the default dhcp settings for a wifi pineapple. It's the /24 mask given on the .42 that's a little suspicious because that's not a common range for anything else.

Being assigned one of those specific 253 hosts with that subnet mask would definitely make me think twice.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Pretty sure it's an autocomplete (like copilot or something)

They were typing

progress != "Hold"

And the ai autocomplete suggested

progress != "Hold onto your butts!"

Hence why the completion part is in grey (it's a suggestion)

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I was going to come up with something fun and clever to keep it going but the next line of the real song starts with "cream-coloured ponies" so I think we should probably just leave it here after all.

There are some of the internet's things that we don't need to enumerate.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

Best is very subjective.

.world is a good general purpose instance for just about anything. I think it has the biggest population at the moment, so communities there are likely to get at least some engagement.

For "general discussion" it doesn't really matter. The instances are federated so you'll likely get general discussion in comments from lots of people from lots of instances anyway, wherever your community is based.

Some people get almost nationalistic about their chosen instances or have grudges against people from certain other instances. There's sometimes inter-instance politics with some servers defederating with others or threatening to for various reasons. It's kinda fun to watch in a popcorn drama kind of way. For the most part, the instance doesn't matter.

[–] TechLich@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

That's pretty cool!

Although that's probably what op is actually asking for, I don't think it's a modem. It's a router with an access point.

It does have SFP for a fibre connection and pcie and USB for you to potentially add a modem or whatever else you want.

I'm guessing OP is just looking for a wifi router? Otherwise we'd need to know what kind of modem they're looking for, like Cellular? VDSL? HFC? Satellite? It depends on the internet connection. Different parts of the world need very different kit.

 

Apparently as a result of terrorism according to Data. Brexit 2 Northern Ireland edition coming soon?

Memory Alpha page

view more: next ›