Sunsofold

The post-full-transition trans-man: I gotta start all over again? You son of a bitch!

Get someone to do a very long set of interviews, thought experiments, and tests to see what makes us different in order to isolate, regardless of whether we can tell which of us holds the evil position, what areas of belief can have a position than can be objectively called evil. It'd be hilarious if, after months of testing, it turns out the only difference we have is our opinions on marmite or pineapple on pizza.

For each thing you want to buy, ask, 'is this, and and every part that makes it, from my country or one of the ones we don't have tariffs with?' If no, price increase. (You have to pay the 'bought from foreigners tax.)' If yes, no change or maybe a small price increase. (if tariffs push the international product's cost higher than the domestic's, the domestic producer may choose to expand their profit margin rather than maintain previous prices)

They said 'for pleebs' not business patriarchs. For 'pleebs' the answer is:

For each thing you want to buy, ask, 'is this, and and every part that makes it, from my country or one of the ones we don't have tariffs with?' If no, price increase. If yes, no change or maybe a small price increase. (if tariffs push the international product's cost higher than the domestic's, the domestic producer may choose to expand their profit margin rather than maintain previous prices)

So many good ones, I don't know how to choose.

• Interstellar 55555 (slightly cheating)
• Perfect Blue
• The Green Knight
• The Girl With All the Gifts
• Dune (the original)
• Densha Otoko
• Spirited Away
• Dark Knight
• Interstellar
• The Last of Us (game and show)
• Innocent Venus

It's not age that makes you conservative, it's comfort and success. People on the older end of life tend to have advanced more in their career. In the current era, older people in America and Europe have been part of a period of relative success. People who are doing well in the current society don't want it to change. People who are struggling, do. The reason most monied interests support conservative agendas is that they are wealthy because they are suited to the current order. If they actually were to support real change, it'd cost them money.

Don't forget the vocal minority problem. The subset of people who comment on things is much smaller than the set of people who consume them. And while the threshold of effort for making comment is low, it isn't zero, so people who hold more extreme views are going to be more prevalent in the selection because the people with moderate views aren't going to have the motivation to spend 20 minutes explaining the nuanced position they have, while the 'love' and 'hate' camps will gladly spend 10 seconds on posting their simplistic view.

Add on the way modern systems work, focusing on likes, upvotes, etc. and you get short form responses getting greater engagement purely because they don't take as long to read. It's always easier to get traction with a short, maybe amusing, rehash of a common opinion than with a long dissertation on niche, complex views.

That cycles back in at the top to create a visibility bias so the people making the next round of commentary/content see the wave of love/hate and try to ride it. The result is a feedback loop with a terrible signal to noise ratio.

I'm not one to say it doesn't matter. I know the benefit good nursing provides. I'm saying, in modern culture, especially in the circles who have political, economic, and cultural power, there is, and has been for decades, a push to think of a college education as an investment product that benefits the purchaser, with little to no consideration being given to societal benefit. They are acting as if your work is not more meaningful/beneficial to society than, say, a Marketing Director. (a position of similar wage which I would say is, at least, not as beneficial, if not actually harmful to society)

Nursing, for instance, is a profession, or even a vocation, which provides tremendous societal benefit, both in the direct 'people's lives in medical settings suck less' sense and in the indirect 'people get back to health and productivity' sense. Despite this, it's not common, as far as I've seen, for governments to offer much in the way of benefits to nurses as reward for their service. There's even a tendency to, when they ask for a raise, to take an attitude of 'You should be happy. At least you get to know you're helping people. We need all these extra profits to help compensate us for doing our jobs that don't help people.'

Mostly as an aside, I've actually thought for years that nurses and doctors who are providing direct care to patients (i.e. not people who went to Med/Nursing school and then went into medicine-adjacent business, but people putting in direct labor to help heal people) should have a significant tax cut. Their work benefits society more than the money it would represent, and a cut would make their lives easier, and help balance the years of tuition and effort it takes to get to that position.

In the current system, education isn't viewed as a system of societal improvement but as a product to improve the standing of the individual. Because the individual is seen as the only one who benefits from their education, the individual pays for it.

As others have said, there are lots of divides in various cultures. From what I have heard, many people from the Americas look down on those from further south in the Americas. (Americans look down on Mexicans, who look down on Guatemalans, etc.) I've heard there are still certain views regarding Han Chinese versus others in China, xenophobia in Japan, sectarianism between subsets of Islam, and a basic level of nativism throughout much of the world. For America, the culture started with the era of 'scientific' racism so it started with a color divide. Those old divides remain because certain classes of people keep reinforcing because it helps their narrative. In the same way you can look at what happened with American healthcare through a Marxist, free-market-absolutist, or various other views, you can look at America through various lenses, and the racial one still holds a lot of sway. As long as enough people identify with the grouping, it grants political power to those who have authority in that group. The power is used to reinforce the identity to perpetuate itself and the cycle continues. It takes fairly drastic circumstances to change that.

Popped open the article to find out, and the answer is neither. The 'milk' is crystals collected by cutting open a particular kind of roach and extracting them from its brood sack.

There's a phrase I didn't know I'd be using today.

What about a 360deg camera, where the target person is yourself, and anyone else captured is merely incidental/background?