Since you forgot to add - - preserve-root It won’t go too far
Go on then ... try it.
Or don't because you will erase your system. (Hint: it's in the asterisk)
Since you forgot to add - - preserve-root It won’t go too far
Go on then ... try it.
Or don't because you will erase your system. (Hint: it's in the asterisk)
as the binary is already loaded into memory
That’s not the reason why it continues. It’s because there’s still a file descriptor open to rm
.
That’s not the reason why it continues. It’s because there’s still a file descriptor open to rm
.
In Unix/Linux, a removed file only disappears when the last file descriptor to it is gone. As long as the file /usr/bin/rm
is still opened by a process (and it is, because it is running) it will not actually be deleted from disk from the perspective of that process.
This also why removing a log file that's actively being written to doesn't clear up filesystem space, and why it's more effective to truncate it instead. ( e.g. Run > /var/log/myhugeactivelogfile.log
instead of rm /var/log/myhugeactivelogfile.log
), or why Linux can upgrade a package that's currently running and the running process will just keep chugging along as the old version, until restarted.
Sometimes you can even use this to recover an accidentally deleted file, if it's still held open in a process. You can go to /proc/$PID/fd
, where $PID
is the process ID of the process holding the file open, and find all the file descriptors it has in use, and then copy the lost content from there.
kill -9 1
Leave the poor kernel out of it, it has nothing to do with this. It's Lennart, not Linus.
I don't think it's intended as a "solution", it just lets the clobbering that is caused by the case insensitiveness happen.
So git just goes:
If you add a third or fourth file ... it would just continue, and file gets checked out first gets the filename and whichever file gets checked out last, gets the content.
Depending upon their genre and your city’s size, they may never come nearby you
The joy of living in a central, densely populated area of Europe ... I've been able to see almost all niche bands that I'm into live.
The problem with that is that they are usually in tiny venues, often with no seating (some of us have issues with standing for a few hours straight), and absolutely terrible acoustics.
Not true at all where I live, except for the seating part sometimes. There are many small to midsized venues with ticket prices well below €50, and they all have way better accoustics than the large concert halls, and it's a much more personal experience than in a >10,000 people venue because you can be way up close with the artists.
For example, these are all venues I've visited in recent years, I rarely paid more than €30 for a ticket:
It tells you there's a name clash, and then it clones it anyway and you end up with the contents of README.MD
in README.md
as an unstaged change.
yet all I needed is a "this side up" symbol ...