I highly recommend to not do that. You can write some of your current policies but not current interactions.
Sagar
joined 2 years ago
What do you mean?
suckless.org
Less.
Thank you. One of my teachers Gaddam Vijaya Prakash, taught us to ask the right question. This is the right question.
AI per se is not bad but the offensive uses of AI are much higher than defensive. No one likes to be attacked. When secrets are collected, if it reaches a 100 people, one of them is bound to misuse those secrets.
Relatively unpopular
suckless.org
One of the best ever!
Honest person. I like him.
Yes, I'm mistaken wrt quoting Stoics, but I do believe in the "no point". There's a nice quote in Steven Weinberg's book "To Explain the world" that no pattern has been found in basic laws of physics which explain that there's an objective to life. I'm a physics major, btw.
Hinduism is very broad. I suggest you take a look at a small philosophy of Yoga by reading "Yoga Sutra by Patanjali".
Stoics discovered it a while ago, there's no point to life.
Hindus go a step ahead and devise methods to improve balance by dharma, something which continues.
I use alovoa. My loves are typically 6000kms away from me.
Owner is trying to converse in catlang! Programmer alert!
When technologies like BCI, brain-computer interfaces are made, one can literally track and influence, physically influence signals in your brain. Everything subtle, strong, horrific, good, bad, or any other adjective you can think of comes from that brain.
In today's world where everything is recorded for a possible time of rest of your life, it is important to write what will work in your best interests. If you must write, you should definitely leave out extreme attractions or enmities as those will definitely give you problems. Put everything casually.