Doesn't Lemmy support cross posting?
I considered implementing Lemmy comments and theorised I'd post to my own community/instance so I had full moderation control, then cross post that to all the relevant communities.
Rogue
joined 1 year ago
This really shows how antiquated a lot of our rail network still is. I wouldn't have believed this were still possible. We've had safeguards to prevent this kind of issue since the age of steam.
I'm going to hazard a wild guess that privatisation and tory cuts are the ultimate cause of this.
This has been one of my biggest frustrations while learning Rust. I'm coming from .NET which has an incredible wealth of official System and Microsoft libraries all of which are robust and well documented.
Rust on the other hand has the bare minimum std library, with everything else implemented by the community. There isn't even a std async library. It's insane.
Even the popular community libraries are severely lacking in documentation or inexplicably unmaintained.
Rust has a ton of potential but it desperately needs some broad funding to align the fundamentals to a decent standard.
OpenAI is boasting that they are about to make a lot of the legal profession permanently unemployed.
There is a hell of hype but some of it is justified.
Chat GPT is really good at explaining stuff. Try asking to explain inventory capitalization, and just repeatedly ask it to explain it simpler and simpler and simpler. Then ask why repeatedly. It has a hell of lot more patience than a human and the client is going to be far less embarrassed repeatedly asking an AI than a human.
I'd also expect it to be pretty good at picking out relevant case law if to feed it a specific issue. However, where issues will arise is it will just make shit up at some point and it'll seem absolutely legit so you'll accept it without question.
A quick glance and this seemed nothing to do with self documenting code and everything to do with the flaws when code isn't strictly typed.
Is your issue somebody profiting from including the work in a collection? If so non-commercial might achieve your aims. Just add a note that people can reach out to you directly for commercial use.
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
first experience - leaving is impossible. Back button loops can to the app.
The funding.json file requires a full name email and phone number. Absolutely ridiculous. People are already scraping git commit emails for spam mail, this is just making their lives easier
Anything is better than minetest which sounded like a hastily written debugging mod for Minecraft
I had the same issue so wrote this down when I figured it out
Generate ultimate key
gpg2 --quick-generate-key hello@example.com ed25519 default 0
Add sub key
gpg2 --quick-add-key <FINGERPRINT> ed25519
List keys in long format
gpg2 --list-keys --with-subkey-fingerprint --keyid-format long
The open alternatives don't have particularly good UIs which was a massive perk of GitKraken.
These days I rely heavily on the Git UI within jetbrains various IDEs. If you're working on open source projects then you can get a free license. Or they do educational discounts. If you're using it commercially then it's going to be roughly the same price as for Kraken but you get a best in class IDE included...
The antiquated single track setup.
Which apparently has no physical lockout to prevent two trains entering the same stretch of line.