You dismiss people who say AMD's Linux support is superior to NVidia's, justifying your position because you claim you haven't had an issue with NVidia on Linux in 10 years. I just gave you an example of one of the biggest game titles of the year that, unlike with NVidia GPUs, works perfectly on AMD/Linux DAY ONE.
Seethe harder.
How's Starfield "just working" out for you?
XFS supports trim too, and is arguably the highest performing filesystem for NVMEs in terms of multi-theaded use-cases. BTRFs is among the slowest filesystems for NVMEs both in IOPS and sequential metrics.
Well, first of all, snapshots are not backups and should not be relied upon as such. They don't protect you from a gamut of risks such as filesystem corruption, hardware failures, etc.
As far as backups, basically you can take your pick. Personally I use Duplicacy to back up my workstations to my file/media server, then from there my most critical data is backed up off site to secured cloud storage.
Timeshift is another popular tool.
There are many options out there.
Of course you can. My point is, it's a ridiculous decision on OpenSUSE's part to ship it this way in the first place.
Like sudo requiring you to use the root password?
Isn't one of the principal reasons sudo exists is so you DONT need to know or use the root password to perform root-level tasks?
It's an idiotic choice on OpenSUSE's part IMO.
Yep, XFS is pretty much universally supported and in fact even the default filesystem for Fedora Server and RHEL. No snapshots, unfortunately. XFS's "claim to fame" is scalability, performance, and stability.
I've not seen this particular issue, but BTRFS is a turd on NVME. It does about 2/3 to 1/2 the IOPS of EXT4 or XFS on several PCIe 3.0 and 4.0 drives I've tested on several modern AMD and Intel systems. XFS actually has the upper-hand on NVME performance over EXT4, but not by much.
Lol resorting to name calling?