So MI5 can get parties to drop candidates just by saying they "could" be a spy, without proof, or conviction?
Literally anyone "could" be a spy.
Doesn't that mean the spooks can basically veto any candidate they don't like?
I'd say it was written by an AI, but I doubt even an AI would make such a mistake.
Only 73% I expected it to be higher.
Perhaps it's more to do with changes to the internet over the past 5 or so years? Such as the pervasive rise of algorithmic feeds designed to drive "engagement"?
KGB still exists in Belarus.
Nicotine on it's own isn't particularly addictive. It only becomes highly addictive when combined with the MAO inhibitors found in tobacco, primarily harman and norharman.
Damn, imagine dying during open heart surgery because some old fart couldn't stop himself from grabbing a booby.
Looking at their annual report on company house, last year they had a total revenue of £228,923, hardly a "giant".
Yeah, that's what I assumed it was supposed to mean, but it really doesn't read that way to me.
Beehaw is looking to shut down and or completely defederate.
They already de-federated 447 instances, I doubt that will make much difference.
It's an inkwell, seems old, possibly bronze, but who is it supposed to be?
Kind of annoying, they could have used that space for a bigger battery, bigger heatsink, memory card reader, more ports, etc.