Revonult

joined 1 year ago
[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago

Sounds like he is helping the FBI out on a sting operation in exchange for a lighter sentence.

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Words hard. Ty 😊

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

He's so close! Somehow his racism took him down a weird convoluted path and ended up with gun control.

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Maybe as a fire starter you could short the terminals or the plates/cells with a spike.

Most expensives work by rapidly generating a large volume of gas in a compact area. The rapid expansion of the gas creates a Shockwave that can be used as a concussion blast or break about the bomb housing to throw shrapnel. Not really anything close to the same reaction. But this is all kinds of explosives...

Edit: Crwayes to creates

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There is a difference between feasibility hype and adoption hype. The hype about it being possible at all has passed. But the true hype relevant to the graph is when it is implemented in the general economy, outside of labs and research facilities.

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Cows naturally produce milk, I am sure there is no unethical practices there.

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I have heard, but not sure about accuracy, that Latinos who are already here in the US support shutting down the border as it's less competition and/or draws less attention from racisits persicuting all lationos regarless of immigration status. Kinda like a "got mine, fuck you" mentality which is very GOP.

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The F-35 is a stealth aircraft with a radar cross section of a large bird. The joke is the F-35 pilot is "selecting" what large bird their cross-section resembles and represents America.

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

West coast caves are safer apparently. /s

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (26 children)

So I get the idea that companies shouldn't be slaves to shareholders or the whims of a few people, but would the employees owning the company mean they are shouldering financial risk? Like if my company goes bankrupt I just lose my job, I am not responsible for covering their losses.

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I have been trying to find this info and have not been able to yet. Short of counting the shots from a video I am not sure we will 100% know until the investigation is done. I will edit my previous comment to reflect uncertainty.

Edit: This article claims the counter sniper who killed him only fired one shot. Although perhaps more SS officers fired?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/timeline-trump-rally-shooting/

[–] Revonult@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't really get this argument. If somone with enough knowledge about sights, ammo, and long range shooting experience to hit a target with a hunting rifle could also hit it with an AR15. The range in this instance was not excessive and well within the capabilities of both rifles. The difference is an AR15 can put a whole lot more shots down range, much faster. Obviously, I am aware that rapid semi auto fire or semi auto rifles in general are less accurate.

Being able to shoot more rounds can make up for lack of skill. An amateur with an AR15 is much more likely to hit their target or inflict more damage than an amateur with a hunting rifle. Here a skilled shooter could have done it with either.

view more: ‹ prev next ›