Nope, "y'all" is still not the problematic part
Revan343
Lol, those specific people are fucking pansies; ignore them, but don't paint the whole community the same colour as them
Might I ask what sort of drugs?
I'm spitballing, but my guess would be the water crystals damage the fibres, softening them
Yep, the difference between .444... And .5 is only .0555...
Who notices 5 nintieths of something? That's going to be within the error of sloppy measuring anyways
His social media investment absolutely paid off
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/removed
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wetback_(slur)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spic
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paki_(slur)
So yeah. Not that 'Zionist' is a slur
Edit: Really, shitty censorship bot? We're adulterating URLs now, and selectively only that specific slur? Gross on both counts
The right wing has never supported veterans
"G'day cunts" goes over either extremely well or extremely poorly, with no in-between
Better than 50 gallon drums of napalm
Literally the entire rest of the sentence is the problematic part. "We don't take kindly to you", doesn't matter if they say "y'all", "you all", "you people", "your kind", take your pick, it's not the problem with the sentence