PupBiru

joined 1 year ago
[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago

i have a friend here in au who’s a barrister, and he said that one of the witnesses started going on about their 5th amendment rights… the judge rolled his eyes and just explained that we aren’t in the US, we don’t have the 5th amendment, and if he refuses to answer the question he will take it as an admission of guilt

it’s crazy how ingrained in just… global culture… the US is

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

rule 2: when someone tells you who they are, believe them
rule 1: trust but verify

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

that’s a lack of understanding of concepts though, rather than a lack of creativity… curation requires that you understand the concept that you’re trying to curate: this looks more like a dog than this; this is a more attractive sunset than this

current LLMs and ML don’t understand concepts, which is their main issue

id argue that it kind of does “think about its own thoughts” to some degree: modern ML is layered, and each layer of the net feeds into the next… one layer of the net “thinks about” the “thoughts” of the previous layer. now, it doesn’t do this as a whole but neither do we: memories and neural connections are lossy; heck even creating a creative work isn’t going to turn out exactly like you thought it in your head (your muscle memory and skill level will effect the translation from brain to paper/canvas/screen)

but even we hallucinate in the same way. don’t look at a bike, and then try and draw a bike… you’ll get general things like pedals, wheels, seat, handlebars, but it’ll be all connected wrong. this is a common example people use to show how our brains aren’t as precise and we might like to think… drawing a bike requires a lot of very specific things to be in very specific places and that’s not how our brain remembers the concept of “bike”

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 0 points 11 months ago (4 children)

it’s only qualitative because we don’t understand it

when an LLM “experiences” new data via training, that’s subjective too: it works its way through the network in a manner that’s different depending on what came before it… if different training data came before it, the network would look differently and the data would change the network as a whole in a different way

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago (7 children)

and experience is ongoing learning, so if an LLM were training on things after the pretraining period then that’d allow it to be creative in your definition?

but in that case, what’s the difference between doing that all at once, and doing it over a period of time?

experience is just tweaking your neurons to make new/different connections

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

the company can refuse to deliver mail under a few obvious situations:

  • too far off regular delivery routes (though depending on the laws behind postal delivery in sweden this might not be an acceptable reason for postnord, but certainly would have to be for a private company)
  • consistent danger to delivery personnel

so there’s definitely a line somewhere. i think that postnord is arguing that it can’t force its employees to deliver to tesla in the same way that it can’t force its employees to deliver to a dangerous address. the article also states that the right to strike is part of the swedish constitution

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

yeah that’s also correct and a very valid criticism

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago

wake up, time for some SYN 😈

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

ml doesn’t understand jokes very well, so honestly it’s not a shit example lol

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

the other important thing with all of this is that even if your girlfriend is taking care, THEY STILL KNOW

people around you (or “you”, in this case) using these services impacts your privacy

is there anything we can do about that? probably not

but it’s worth being aware of

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 12 points 11 months ago

i’ve seen the bullet points from that article riffed in different ways, but i think that’s the most important part:

  • They know you rang a phone sex line at 2:24 am and spoke for 18 minutes. But they don't know what you talked about.
  • They know you called the suicide prevention hotline from the Golden Gate Bridge. But the topic of the call remains a secret.
  • They know you got an email from an HIV testing service, then called your doctor, then visited an HIV support group website in the same hour. But they don't know what was in the email or what you talked about on the phone.
  • They know you received an email from a digital rights activist group with the subject line “Let’s Tell Congress: Stop SESTA/FOSTA” and then called your elected representative immediately after. But the content of those communications remains safe from government intrusion.
  • They know you called a gynecologist, spoke for a half hour, and then called the local abortion clinic’s number later that day.
[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

i can’t find a single reference to that. i think you’re confused

view more: ‹ prev next ›