NiHaDuncan

joined 1 week ago
[–] NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That is not the false dichotomy you proposed, you just moved the goal posts to make it an actual dichotomy.

[–] NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That is a false dichotomy. If you accept the idea of the existence of cases with certainty there is the possibility of the restriction of the use of the death penalty to those cases.

[–] NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I don’t believe pointing out a case where certainty is ensured missed the point; rather, it argues the point. He’s giving an example where execution would be okay due to their being absolute certainty, not arguing that it should be the same outcome where there isn’t absolute certainty.

[–] NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That’s what he’s talking about.

[–] NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

North/south would be latitude, so they could easily and accurately position them correctly with respect to that aspect.

[–] NiHaDuncan@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You are wrong, those are 5.45x39mm being fired out of an ak-74. 7.62x54r are much bigger and don’t have an associated Bakelite mag like the one used, and on top of that they aren’t fire out of AKs. The only thing close is a molot hunting rifle.