Nechesh

joined 1 year ago
[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Mine was lower than that. I will also not elaborate.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Definitely not!

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Did an AI write this comment?

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 32 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This would have effectively ended all ballot initiatives in Ohio. I was happy to vote no and even happier to see it lose.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not easy for people to escape a submerged vehicle in still body of water, especially if the vehicle flips. Add in a raging river tumbling everything around, pushing everywhere... Even if you were able to escape the vehicle I don't think your chances of making it to shore from the middle would be good.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It seems likely. That vehicle was just swallowed by a flooding river. It's technically possible the occupants escaped, but unlikely.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

This seems largely symbolic. I don't see Apple or Wikipedia paying, and paying might even be illegal at this point.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

The best pointer

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

There are some valid criticisms in this post. I agree that for large programs Python is a poor choice, but I think 100 lines is arbitrary small. I would probably start thinking about a different language at maybe 500-1000 lines. There's a lot of really useful stuff you can do in a program that size.

The post also fails to mention some of the things python is good at. It's good at clearly and concisely expressing intent, and rapidly iterating, and it has a huge number of libraries available to do almost anything easily.

[–] Nechesh@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Ah, good one. What about Kg1? That prevents Rh2 and Qxd8 prevents Rxd8.

view more: ‹ prev next ›