Mangosniper

And what is when X decides to ban an account you are interested in? You can't do anything against it. In your mastodon you could still read it on that instance. Or maybe there is a client where you can add two accounts and show content of both? And do you think X or Bluesky does not cooperate with law enforcement and gives data if the US government wants it?

I support this proposal

Probably. I still find a lot of people here on Lemmy (and the other fuck you spez platform before) that are very very convinced we need to reroute a substantial amount of our effort into building nuclear reactors as renewables can never ever sustain everything and in general there is no storage.

But you are right in general.

Vorlage

Also, wenn jeder Staat seine Wirtschaft auf das nötigste zurückfahren würde, glaube ich schon dass das mehr bringt als alles andere was bisher gemacht wurde. Also nur noch Kleidung, Unterkunft, Essen, Medizin und vll nen Ball und ein paar Bücher für jeden. Will ich so leben? Nicht wirklich, ich und jeder andere hat gesehen was geht und es ist immer schwer was aufzugeben, geschweige denn alles.

Aber hört mich an: Wie wäre es wir bauen alle Geräte so, dass sie doppelt so lange halten wie bisher. Ein Handy 10 Jahre. Ein Fernseher 15 Jahre. Und es muss so gebaut sein dass es nachweislich 99% recycled werden kann. Da würden sich tolle neue Jobs entstehen um die Geräte zu reparieren, einzusammeln zu warten etc.

Aber was sagen dann alle die die Fäden in der Hand haben um das zu tun: “Aber die arme Wirtschaft!“

People will always find a reason to smash their heads, however they call it. All hail to the Allied Atheist Alliance my fellow 🦦

2400000000 / 58000000 ~ 41. 234000 / 70000 ~ 3. If we talking about preserving birds I would still address the cat issue before the wind turbine issue.

Also there is a chance that birds killed by ~~cats~~ windturbines were already weak and soon to die.

Don't take the above sentence seriously. It's just to show that arguments that seem nice might not hold their value at second glance.

In comparison with the other issues we have, the bird Windturbine one is a non-issue. However, it gets thrown in the ring over and over again, achieving exactly what the people persuing it want: distraction. It's the same with nuclear, it's the same with “ but we can't store the energy“. A lot of decoys to slow down the process while we already have everything we need to take on the problem. Please people, don't take the bait, focus on implementing the solution.

Uhm.. 2400000000 / 58000000 ~ 41. 234000 / 70000 ~ 3. If we talking about preserving birds I would still address the cat issue before the wind turbine issue.

Yeah... bird smashers... say, do you have a cat?

Ein Verbot wurde Parteienfinanzierung und Platform entziehen. Parteivermögen wird eingezogen, vll Immunitäten aufgehoben. Die müssen sich mit Gerichtsverfahren rumschlagen. Etc.