LufyCZ

joined 1 year ago
[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Words evolve, and sometimes, they gain new meanings. "Bare metal" is not a scientific terms, and so it can be bent depending on the context.

You can either accept that or not, it doesn't change the fact that that's what it now can mean.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world -4 points 7 months ago (4 children)

It's just what it means in this specific context.

They're not running directly on the host, with directly meaning directly.

If you go by definition, I agree with you, but the definition is not always the thing to go off of.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (7 children)

Have you read my comment? It's about where the packages and services are installed.

In this case, they're installed in the container, not on the host

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (9 children)

Not in this context. Bare metal means all packages and services installed and running directly on the host, not through docker/lxc/vms

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 77 points 7 months ago (6 children)

Earth doesn't have any bills though, dues to the United Federation of Planets are set to start in 2161 at the earliest

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago
[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Yeah, but people don't like change, and I'd expect low level engineers to like it even less.

And looking at Linux, that shit still supports ancient hardware, being able to actually get rid of old code (that now has to be maintained alongside the new code) is gonna be a PITA.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

I'm just guessing, but what about backwards compatibility? Or cross-system compatibility?

For example, something like a syscall that's existed for 20 years. Changing it would break old apps.

Of course you could just keep the now "old" syscall and add new methods that replicate it's behavior, but haven't you then introduced bloat? More ways to do the same thing, meaning (eventually) more bugs, more fragmentation, memory usage, etc.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 28 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In that case I'm sure they're enjoying their 60 cents per month

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago (11 children)

You could actually run an actual legit miner on the thing, but yeah, you're not getting ahead your electricity usage.

[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

They live with 2 roommates

 

Hey, I've got a bunch of services all running in their own containers/vms on Proxmox. All of these have their own ips that are accessible from my network.

I also have a container with a reverse proxy, which acts as a gateway for access to these services (it's IP is the only one allowed to go through the firewall of each service).

These services have http servers, no encryption. Could someone on my network listen to comms between a service and my reverse proxy?

Would have to play around with VLANs if that's the case...

Thanks

view more: next ›