KairuByte

joined 1 year ago
[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Not failing, but actively ignoring Metas own research that shows Facebook is directly harmful to children and teens.

I’d say actively continuing to harm children should outrank being a jackass and/or incompetence.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Depends on if we consider Zuccer a person.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 35 points 10 months ago (4 children)

“I only reluctantly support the guy saying he will be a dictator, therefore don’t lump me in with the people who happily support him.” 🤦🏻‍♂️

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

These “ai says” articles are all fluff. You can get an LLM to say just about anything you want. This is akin to “my child says we should eat the neighbor.”

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Seed boxes are inherently handling replaceable data, bar unpopular torrents. This is such a silly comparison.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

You can agree with something someone says, and disagree with something else they say or do.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

We’ll still be hulks, it just won’t be that incredible.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can have the most secure and secret OS in existence, and you’re failing miserably the moment it has unfettered access to the internet.

On the flip side, literally any OS can be secure if it’s airgapped in a sealed room.

There’s a happy medium in there, and that’s where most governments want to be.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

“It’s okay sweetie, the world is literally burning, drowning, and sometimes both at the same time! But in order to protect you, I’ll just say we have no idea why or how to prevent it! Wouldn’t want to hurt your fefe’s by telling you that humans are the problem!” 🤦🏻‍♂️

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m sorry to interject, but is it a normal response to blurt out a list of people and groups when you don’t understand what is being said?

When you’re at a party, and someone says something you can’t hear, have you ever just blurted out the names of people at the party?

I don’t understand your thinking here. He either heard him and agreed, or didn’t understand him and decided the best course of action was to just list out names of the opposition. Only one of those makes any sense.

And I have to say, when I heard this without a primer, I fully understood what was being said. As did my wife.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ah okay, just found it curious. Thanks for lettin me know!

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Somewhat niche a use case, but *extremely interesting. Hopefully it can be adapted for other conditions!

view more: next ›