Honey_Enjoyer

joined 1 year ago

I mean could ≠ will lol. I think it’s more likely to be a good thing than a bad thing, but it’s most likely to be nothing

Very well put. I agree with all of this

[–] Honey_Enjoyer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

the system that creates this people, not what's in their pants

True, but the system treats women pretty poorly, from what I’ve read and heard from a friend of mine who’s a woman in the military. Everyone’s different, but I hope that spending years in such a sexist system would inspire them to make change.

one person being different isn't going to make that much of a difference.

I don’t mean to imply they alone will turn the US military based or anything, but being on the joint chiefs and head of the Navy means they could do a significant amount of good.

Realistically I need to wait and see if she’ll actually be a net positive (assuming she actually gets the job) but I think it’s reasonable to see this as a good sign and approach it with cautious optimism - just as it’s reasonable to not care or roll your eyes.

[–] Honey_Enjoyer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

TBF I think having more diversity in military leadership especially could lead to diversity of thought and help improve the US military as a whole, including pushing them towards a less war crime heavy future. I understand your point - I don’t even disagree, really - but I think this is also a genuinely good and newsworthy thing.

[–] Honey_Enjoyer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 139 points 1 year ago (9 children)

The Subreddit in question is r/malefashionadvice, for anyone who doesn’t want to click through