It might with a touch of Thorium
GlitchyDigiBun
joined 1 year ago
It's guardians of the galaxy, my guy. It's character quips spaced by mindless qte's and hack/slash combat in linear, beautifully-designed environments. It's got a story, and if you turn off your brain into "super hero movie" mode, you'll enjoy it. Hardly unique or novel though. Prolly a fun romp.
I'd pay $60 for a second slot.
Isn't there a way to deploy bonemeal to accelerate growth? Either that or scale it up to the output you need.
I've wanted to do this for some time, but everyone tells me there's no way to make it work without constantly updating the blacklist. Is it really such a hassle?
But does it do Mando'A?
Ahoy should host
It's not that you can't make a more efficient device without it. Hell, if you wanted to impress people, you can absolutely populate a board with IC's and traces and build your own logic.
Orrrrr you could spend $45 to get a full GPIO header backed behind a vast online electronics community. Tbh pi's, arduinos, and other ARM core hobby kits give you a root skillset to base any project on. Once you can get logic through your code, there'e no need to figure out wire logic if you can program based on I/O and software variables. But it -is- a different skillset that you'll need to learn to use it efficiently.
Yet language and abstraction are the core of intelligence. You cannot have intelligence without 2 way communication, and if anything, your brain contains exactly that dictionary you describe. Ask any verbal autistic person, and 90% of their conversations are scripted to a fault. However, there's another component to intelligence that the Turing Test just scrapes against. I'm not philosophical enough to identify it, but it seems like the turing test is looking for lightning by listening for rumbling that might mean thunder.
I can tell you're being facetious, but you're 100% right. You do, indeed, need to give every benefit of the doubt in our legal process. That is what is meant by "innocent until proven guilty." They must make it so there is no foothold for appeal. No "well you didn't tell me..." or "you should have had a firm definition for..." No, if the legal system wants to take someone down, REALLY take them down, they must do it with every ounce of assurance and with no room for doubt that this person explicitly broke a law, in full knowledge and with warning, that they can be convicted to the full extent of said law.
Heee's the winnah! Gotta hot hand (gotta hot hand). Place your bets, ladies and gentleman!