Galluf

joined 1 year ago
[–] Galluf@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It is a paradox because there's no objective, universal definition of tolerance. It's literally impossible to be tolerant of everything. So you're left with different forms of what intolerance people deem acceptable.

People make the same mistake about bigotry. It's impossible not to be a bigot. You just don't want to be the wrong kind of bigot. Now if only we could all agree on exactly what that was.

[–] Galluf@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Take a look at how the median income in America compares to your country.

[–] Galluf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's a bit too positive to encompass all that is elitism.

[–] Galluf@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not fishy (at least not intentionally so). It's a limitation of their database. It can only show 1000 comments. So it won't find your very old posts when you sort by them.

So they're not restoring comments. It's just very difficult to find your old comments to actually delete them.

[–] Galluf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's just flat out wrong. Reprocessing is significantly more expensive at current uranium prices.

And so many states would throw up tons of roadblocks for reactors shipping their used fuel offsite to a central reprocessing facility.

[–] Galluf@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, not directly. You'd have to divert it and only irradiate it for short periods of time (30 days rather than the 18 to 24 month cycles that current plants have).

Proliferation isn't a significant concern for reprocessing within the US. It's primarily a concern for other non nuclear weapons countries that start it because they can then create nuclear weapons.

The US has no need to do that. They have more plutonium than they need for current weapons and it has a half life in the hundreds of thousands of years so it will last forever.

[–] Galluf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Where are you getting that? This says 15 Mbps.

https://help.netflix.com/en/node/306

I'm sure you're going to have a worse or slower experience particularly when scrubbing, but it should be just adequate.

[–] Galluf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There's been zero evidence of any updates. Even his editor claimed she hadn't seen a single word of the book a couple years ago.

[–] Galluf@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue is energy density. There's a reason why boat tanks are ~6 times larger than a cars gas tank. That's why they're so expensive (plus batteries are much heavier).

[–] Galluf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What do you mean by this?

[–] Galluf@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Bolt EV or the Leaf are just that.

[–] Galluf@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure why you act as if all innocent people are completely innocent. It could be that they made mistakes and we're careless and that was a part of what led them to being falsely convicted.

Literally zero incentive is an extremely high bar and certainly incorrect.

I understand wanting to ensure there's a better incentive than currently exists, but giving them the death penalty for false death penalties is just a roundabout way of stopping the death penalty. So you may as well just do that directly.

view more: next ›