GabrielBell12fi

joined 1 year ago
 

According to the debate, they had their reasons. But still -- when one hundred and eighty six nations say one thing, and two say another, you have to wonder about the two.

 

I'm just picturing that robot from Star Trek (the one thinking about "this sentence is false") going "huh" and then blowing up........

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

As I said in another comment I hadn't realised he was in prison. My level of interest in the lives of convicted paedophiles is -- and this may not come as a surprise -- very low, so I just thought he was trying to clear his name.

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

"It would vacate his conviction and get him out of prison. His life after may not be great, but he still has money."

That I can understand -- the getting out of prison part. (Sorry -- I don't pay any attention to most of this and really wasn't aware he was in jail).

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But (and I admit this is where my knowledge of what's going on in the US gets a bit sketchy because I live in the UK and -- okay -- don't care all that much) wasn't Cosby's conviction overturned on a technicality? And as far as I can tell he hasn't regained his former glory and former status as "America's Dad"?

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago (9 children)

Merits of the request aside (because I really have no clue) how does this possibly help him?

Does he think the entire world is just going to forget he was originally convicted? That we are just going to go "Oh -- there's that guy who wasn't ever found guilty of looking at child porn and doing sex things with kids"?

Do people who are convicted of stuff then acquitted on technicalities really think that the public just forget all their past crimes because a piece of paper says "sorry -- they were prosecuted one day too late"?

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well -- I am still there and here, so......

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (6 children)

For me? Rexit.

[–] GabrielBell12fi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There was a show years ago called "Not The Nine O'Clock News" that was broadcast on the BBC. It was a comedy show that was REALLY heavy on satire, both about the government of the day, and British society in general.

One of the sketches was a news report about a disaster (I think it was a plane crash?) and it started "A plane has crashed in the Mediterranean Ocean, and here is a list of the casualties in order of important -- three Britons, two Americans, three French, seven Spanish, four Australians......" and well you get the idea.

Does it really surprise you that forty years later not much has changed?