CapriciousDay

joined 1 month ago
[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I can't believe Saudi Arabia are nationalising Pokemon Go when the UK won't even nationalise regional water monopolies. Honestly these things were never great for privacy and given the state of things I'm not sure I'm more concerned about a Saudi entity tracking me than a US one.

Not good news for gay Pokemon fans in that country though.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago

Of course we've all got mental health problems. Our economy is entirely oriented around paying us to service bullshit and then going "what I don't understand" when we have economic problems. Maybe if we get a few thousand more engineers to spend their entire careers pushing numbers with no intrinsic value around that'll fix the problem.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

Nobody needed a crystal ball to know Starmer would be this shit.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Definitely just poking a stick inside a printer

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

I guess fundamentally I see the mind as arising out of physicality and emergent constructs within that physical system rather than being fundamental. The reason the Gaia hypothesis appeals to me then is because it is just an extension of that emergence idea but across the whole world

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago

All capitalists are humans but not all humans are capitalists so it's a bit of an overgeneralisation.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 0 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Maybe like a limited Gaia hypothesis. The whole planet is a conscious thing, we are its braincells and its hands.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 22 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine doing this during a massive bird flu outbreak, in a country that was essentially founded on biological weapons based genocide.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

Well I think there would be some obvious physical limits because of finite processing power like maybe a minimum distance, a maximum viewing distance, a discrete time interval and so on. Maybe some of the system would be modelled stochastically because being fast is more important than being accurate when simulating such a big system.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Any time there's a ready meal from the supermarket and for some reason the adhesive is way stronger than the plastic film. You end up with loads of bits of film just sort of stuck to the rim of it. Super annoying.

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham suggested at the Munich Security Conference over the weekend that Trump’s demand was a clever ploy to bolster declining popular support for the Ukrainian cause. “He can go to the American people and say, ‘Ukraine is not a burden, it is a benefit,’” he said.

I continue to be amazed by how frequently the entire spectrum from ~~mainstream liberal~~ regular conservative to ~~Trumpist conservative~~ fascist fall back on a line which is tantamount to "they're not tricking you, they're tricking someone else! Totally trustworthy!"

[–] CapriciousDay@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

This from the same people who told you to inject disinfectant and are actively distancing themselves from international medical consensus.

 

Or maybe a catchier name would be a "basic human decency GPL extension"

I can't help but notice that organisations constantly co-opt free software which was developed with the intent to promote freedom, use it to spread hate and ideas which will ultimately infringe on freedom for many.

The fact that hateful people who use such software may then go on to use it to promote or otherwise support fascism which prevents others from enjoying the software in the way it was imagined, is one potential manifestation of the paradox of tolerance in this respect. I think this is particularly true for e.g. social media platforms and the fediverse.

My proposal to combat this would be the introduction of a "paradox of tolerance" license which says that organisations which use the software must enforce a bare-minimum set of rules to combat intolerance. So anti-racism, anti-homophobia, anti-transphobia, etc. The idea is then to make overtly hateful organisations legally liable for the use of the software through the incompatibility of the requirements with their hateful belief system.

This could be an extension to GPL and AGPL where the license must be replicated in modified versions of the software, thereby creating virality with these rules.

Is this a thing already? I understand OS and FOSS have historically had a thing for political neutrality but are we not starting to find the faults with this now?

view more: next ›