When I post the same link, it suggests the same title as the article has; "DC judge rejects Trump team’s delay attempt and schedules protective order hearing". You had to type that title on your own, adding your take on the rejection, evidenced by Trump not having to bring "his ass" to court, as the judge specifically waived his appearance for this proceeding. So it's wrong.
That's literally "editorialized".
China has been threatening to invade Taiwan for years now. Not to mention their, at best, dubious claim of the South China Seas through use of naval force for the 9 Dash Line against other nations in the area.
Is invasion the only grounds for moral authority? Does one only need not invade a country to claim it?
And are you claiming that the US sends humanitarian workers, who are actually soldiers, to kill children in other nations?
Also, hilarious they discuss erosion of US moral authority in regards to...Russia, who is actively kidnapping Ukrainian children, China's surveillance and communist state actions, and Iran/Saudi Arabia. That's who I would look towards to set the example for moral authority...
"Biden's Ukraine war"
Yup. The Russian invasion to de-nazify a country because a) Russian puppets were ousted and b) an internationally recognized free/fair election led to an outcome Putin didn't like.
Totally Biden. Just ignore that Zelensky was elected during the Trump regime. Totally Biden's doing, getting him elected while he was....not even the Democratic party nominee.
Yeah, that's sort of the downfall of the whole "they'll come around eventually" mindset. The identity some people possess and want to be known by is "nothing is worse than being a Democrat". Death is preferable to losing to Democrats, so the lengths they'll go to are pretty damn far.
Probably for the best, honestly. I can't bring myself to block people like that, though, because it helps stay on top of the rhetoric being thrown around.