Lock the child rapist up.
Why is this even an argument? Republicans are disgusting sickos, letting this piece of shit roam around, actively protecting him.
Bronzebeard
joined 3 weeks ago
Most AI are not built to answer questions. They're designed to act as some kind of detection/filter heuristic to identify specific things about an input that leads to a desired output.
If you can still use it after you stole it, as opposed to not being able to use it at all... Then it does give you an incentive
It wouldn't be. It would still work. It just wouldn't be exclusively available to the group that created it-any competitive advantage is lost.
But all of this ignores the real issue - you're not really punishing the use of unauthorized data. Those who owned that data are still harmed by this.
Making it open source doesn't change how it works. It doesn't need the data after it's been trained. Most of these AIs are just figuring out patterns to look for in the new data it comes across.
Yes, you're all doing it wrong...by doing it at all.
But this poll is not about the percentage of the justice system that might be trustworthy. It's about how many people thing the system is trustworthy, and if only 1/3 of the system is trying to make it trustworthy, then it demonstrably isn't.
They could get the fuck out of politics.
There's at least 2 others worse than kavanaugh...
The US justice system has gone out of its way to make itself not trustworthy. It's surprising it's that high.
Squadron 42 was initially supposed to be released in 2016.
The ship has sailed on concept of hitting deadlines at that company. Unlike half of their concept ships.
That's stupid. The damage is still done to the owner of that data used illegally. Make them destroy it.
But when you levy such miniscule fines that are less than they stand to make from it, it's just a cost of business. Fines can work if they were appropriate to the value derived.