Bro666

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Bro666@lemmy.kde.social 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Even if you lack knowledge regarding development, advice from professional designers and artists is always appreciated. I think it would be helpful if you picked a project with receptive developers and offered them your insight.

[–] Bro666@lemmy.kde.social 9 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Don't take this the wrong way. While I appreciate the tact with which you have expressed your criticisms, but you may find that your objections all boil down to "I am used to a certain set of tools and now I have to change. The new tools do things differently and I am confused and it is messing with my productivity", that is, the problem is not entirely with the new software, but with you, your workflow and your muscle memory.

[–] Bro666@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is not perfect, of course! It also does not have the resources of Blender. Then again, both pieces of software are quite different and have different uses.

[–] Bro666@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Are you implying that Adobe products are not "300% better"??!??! Outrageous.

[–] Bro666@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 5 months ago

Very hard to say for me. I did use AutoCAD, but it was years ago. I'm talking more than two decades (AutoCAD was first released in the early 80s), so impossible to judge the current state of the software now.

I can say FreeCAD is good for 3D printing stuff. I also like OpenSCAD, a 3D scripting language.

I wrote a 4 part tutorial series that takes you from designing to printing and covered both FreeCAD and OpenSCAD from a beginner's perspective, if you are interested:

Part 1: OpenSCAD

Part 2: More OpenSCAD

Part 3: FreeCAD

Part 4: Slicing and printing

[–] Bro666@lemmy.kde.social 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

So or they are backtracking like Slack did a couple of weeks ago and will seek a way to still do this when no-one is looking, or they are obfuscating their true intentions with blah, or they will just keep users in the dark and lie.

If anyone believes Adobe is not going to take their work and still make them pay for an extortionate license, send them my way, as I have a bridge to sell them.

[–] Bro666@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Be advised that FreeCAD, much like Blender, is in no way easy to use! It is software for doing engineering and architecture stuff. These thing are not simple. FreeCAD's learning curve is steep.

The good news is that there are more and more tutorials online (and many are follow-along videos) that can help get you started.

[–] Bro666@lemmy.kde.social 1 points 5 months ago (6 children)

I agree! Nevertheless I am still astounded at the progress FreeCAD has made in the last... What? Four ~ five years? It has gone from "barely usable" and "lacking in even basic features" to "woah! You can make that with FreeCAD?". Also, the community and third party support and contributions have also exploded. This is vital for the survival of a project like this.

[–] Bro666@lemmy.kde.social 50 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

access and review

and censor and re-use and use to train their AI... Basically they own your art.

Edit: That said, most predictable scummy move of Adobe's long history of scummy moves.

view more: ‹ prev next ›