Borg286

joined 1 year ago
[–] Borg286@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Interesting that a mere 5 million samples could train ChatGPT so strongly. I see attack vectors.

I predict that like Akinator the beginning will be smart till the internet trolls feed it garbage. From there on put it will be severely flawed

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What forcing function is there to make sure Trump's lawyers are actually looking over the evidence. I strongly suspect that they are being given time to look over discovery but are merely planning on throwing out another excuse when May comes by. Those excuses will likely sound like, "well we need more time, nevermind the fact that we actually had time to do the thing."

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Why did it take this long?

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this new law allowing the police to go to carrier companies and demanding to know the phone numbers of people near the riots, or is this closer to the police using your camera without your permission? I would have thought security restrictions on devices would have blocked such intrusive ability.

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

It depends on what you consider spying. The vast majority of devices want some form of push notification capability, which requires being connected to Microsoft/Google/Apple servers, and thus the company knows your IP address. But doing pretty much anything on the internet and you expose your IP address.

If what you mean by spying you think it is looking at what app/program you are doing, recording your keystrokes, recording what your camera sees, the vast majority of devices don't do any of this. Those are done on hacked laptops and school laptop admins that are either creepy and unchecked or overly intrusive.

Somewhere between these two extremes you would say it crosses the boundary into spying. You don't need a custom OS to stop it unless you your threshold is all the way to the push notification level.

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem isn't the exact rate, it is their ability to pay for tax experts so they can avoid having most of their wealth taxed at all. This is why Biden wanted to beef up the IRS and sic them on billionaires. Scrutinize the cracks they slip through.

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Actually, the mouse running the wheel powering the server also needed to clock out for the night.

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Spain also tried to tell Google News to pay up for what they offered for free to people. Google simply shut it down. I haven't checked up to see if news agencies floundered, went elsewhere or thrived as the rich touted would happen.

Canada is claiming the same issues. I suspect there is a symbiotic relationship between news agencies and social media that connects eyes with publishers.

I agree with the general sentiment that Facebook users are more siloed than those heading to Google News. But paying to show a snippet just isn't feasible.

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is the interpretation?

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

He may be trying to give Pootin a way to blame the ministry of defense for providing Pootin, Wagner and the Russian people false information. A way for Pootin to blame someone not named prigozhin. Sadly with the ministry of defense making public statements against prigozhin they are trying to force Pootin to pick between the two. Either way it is a win for us.

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Does anyone know what exactly this doping did? The article was lacking on specifics.

[–] Borg286@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Those 5 million users didn't seem to come here? We still have improvements to make a layman resume their reddit activity here. This just seems like a loss of the community overall.

But if the same percentage of people come over we are looking at roughly a 10x growth, at a minimum.

view more: next ›