Amicchan

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

But you’re probably gonna get banhammered anyway. Thanks to horde of libertarians in the internet every discussion about those things is automatically considered bad faith pedo bait everywhere except liberast pits.

Yep. They suck. 😒

That’s why internet marxist stance is “do not talk about it”. From what i see in the real life marxist theoreticians also basically just accepted current societal norm without any comments.

OK, thanks.

[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Never said prepubescent sex was good. It's still bad because it damages the child.

[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 years ago (5 children)

You’re assuming age of consent is about puberty, reproduction, but age of consent is about being intellectually capable of understanding and having responsibility for actions, which isn’t something you can measure in a physical sense.

  1. Intellectual knowledge in a person would have to be physical though, otherwise it wouldn't affect the brain (and they wouldn't learn anything).
  2. Simple solution then: Initiate sex education at all school levels and multiple times.

“the conclusion of sexual development allows a person to have sex without sustaining damage” this is baseless and incorrect

How is it baseless and incorrect? Without puberty, humans would never become able to sexually reproduce safely and also develop into adults.

fucking creepy as shit, tbh

What's creepy about saying that ending puberty allows a person (or adult in that case) to perform sex safely (without sustaining damage)?

 

I have noticed that when I looked at some discussions on age-of-consent that the arguments are often built on metaphysics. (For example, the idea that sexual development (or puberty) has definite, exact stages; and start or end dates.)

However, the dialectical materialist conception opposes metaphysics; so this would mean that if the age-of-consent is built on metaphysics; then it will not correspond to material reality.

This would include the start and end of sexual development in people; some people self-initate or end puberty much earlier (like at 8 or 9 years age) than what is traditionally expected (12 to 13 years age); and the rate of puberty onset has changed with the material conditions^[J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Nov; 60(11): 910–911. doi: 10.1136/jech.2006.049379 PMCID: PMC2465479 PMID: 17053275] (as dialectical materialism predicts).

So, if a person ends puberty (sexual development) much earlier than the age-of-consent and has gotten clear sex education; then should they still be not allowed to have sex until that age? What about adults having late puberty? What about people who never went through puberty, like some people with Kallmann Syndrome?


Since the conclusion of sexual development allows a person to have sex without sustaining damage, with good and proper sex education (as is education that doesn't lead to rape), that would mean the person would be able to safely have sex, even if they have late puberty or end puberty earlier than expected. This is the opinion I've developed from my rethinking on this topic.

 

transafiŝita el: https://lemmy.ml/post/759598

Kamarado Hó Ĉi Minh!

Ĉu ajn homo aŭ ajn reto havas ĉin libron?

Comrade Ho Chi Minh (is based AF)!

Does anyone or any site have this book?

 

Kamarado Hó Ĉi Minh!

Ĉu ajn homo aŭ ajn reto havas ĉin libron?

[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Better yet, get rid of alcohol.

 

z

 

Mi ŝatas vorton «dialektikismo» anstataŭ «dialektikoj» aŭ anglan «dialectics».

3
Dialectics4Kids (dialectics4kids.org)
[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

because people's solutions are lead by individualized fears. /j

 

Koloniistoj: "¡ĈiUj lErNu AnGlAn!"

Ankaŭ koloniistoj: Kolerita kie pro nedenaskaj popoloj malpovas diri anglan (lingvon)

 

¿Markseca rigardkaptilo estus kion?

[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Also: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-00186-y

and of course:

Article conclusion: take antidepressants if you're told to and don't worry about your gut microbiome, even though that's probably what made you depressed in the first place. We only treat symptoms, not causes.

[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Yep. Now I see finance capital in full force.

[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Seems like the U.S is now extracting Europe's surpluses.

La Usono ŝajne prenas Eŭropan pliojn.

[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

This event is going to be a gut check and a test to all western Marxists. Be weary of anyone who commits the errors Maow and Lenin pointed out.

[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

"Mental illness"

Oh god…

view more: ‹ prev next ›