AmbiguousProps

joined 8 months ago
 

That’s the upfront cost. When you factor in the potential incentives and much lower running costs, the numbers are even better.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/bK5nh

 

Since 2019, every Pennsylvanian has had a vote-by-mail option. But policies on drop boxes and mail-in ballot errors can vary across the state’s 67 counties.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/wXQMa

 
  • Republican poll-watcher planning raises prospects of noncitizen voting
  • North Carolina election officials air concerns about potential voter and poll worker intimidation
  • Voting rights advocates say effort is aimed at creating doubt in the event of a Kamala Harris victory

Archive link: https://archive.ph/FdLeX

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (10 children)

That's exactly what I just said, yes. It was also (unsurprisingly) staged. I'm blaming you for sharing trump's propaganda as usual, sorry that it went over your head.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes, the banks know. Their cut is usually large enough for them to look the other way.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, he's been showing his true motives directly lately, rather than just pretending to be third party

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (16 children)

who cares about this stunt? He's not suffering and it just promotes him on the right.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 43 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

The GOP wants to send you to war and then question your eligibility to vote, all while pretending to be thankful for your service.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 4 points 4 weeks ago

Your attitude to polling feels a bit like right wing attitudes towards lgbtq stuff "I don't get it, I don't want to learn about it so I dislike it!"

And this is where I call it. You're saying my (rightful) distrust of polling is comparable to straight up bigotry? They are not even close to the same thing, and honestly as a queer it's pretty disgusting to see you bring up something that I've battled against my entire life all so you can feel like you're the smartest one in the room.

I now see that you don't really give a shit, and just want desperately to be right. I don't need to talk to you about this any more.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 7 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I didn't write the propaganda, I just posted it! Posting propaganda isn't against the rules, so luckily I can hide behind the mods for posting it.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

And if you or anyone else is dumb enough to see "trump has a 51% chance of winning" and that somehow makes you not want to vote, damn, how many tries does it take you to put your shoes on the correct feet? Three?

I already voted, so don't attempt insinuate that I'm not voting. You do realize that most people do not vote, right? And that most people are indeed idiots when it comes to politics? It's those people that will not turn out when it's needed because they saw a pollster say their candidate was ahead.

We're in a country where a known racist conman was elected.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 3 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (4 children)

They sure didn't get 2016 right, which is what I referenced and what caused distrust. Just because they got 2020 right doesn't mean they'll get 2024 correct. It's meaningless and only serves to make people feel like they don't have to turn out. They definitely don't just "predict the future".

Also, I'm not sure if quoting the very pollsters that got 2016 wrong will make people trust them now. It's certainly not working for me.

[–] AmbiguousProps@lemmy.today 12 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

No matter what Nate says and how many times you link his website, polls do not matter.

ETA: maybe, just maybe, you're being downvoted because you keep linking the same article from the same pollster to defend polling.

view more: ‹ prev next ›