AlDente

joined 1 year ago
[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"Am I doing this right?"

No. You are inversing every statement that follows your questions. Why would we outlaw boats if they are safer than cars as you claim? Did you instead mean to say cars are safer than boats or ask why we haven't outlawed cars? Rinse and repeat for the other pairings.

E: You do realize you're saying the exact opposite thing than the person you're trying to mock, right?

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

I ❤️ fishnets. The texture is so satisfying.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 months ago

From the link:

"Customers will use traditional money transfers to send money to a digital Exchange and in return receive (anonymized) digital cash. Customers can use this digital cash to anonymously pay Merchants."

They may be calling their monetary units the same names as their fiat counterparts, but this is clearly a different digitalized currency with exchanges as middlemen. Furthermore,

"in practice a fraudulent Exchange might go bankrupt instead of paying the Merchants and thus the Exchange will need to be audited regularly like any other banking institution."

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago

I'm listening to the bathroom fan whirl while I take my post-coffee dump.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago

I've never heard it before. It sounds like something people would only use on social media and not in the real world. I'm glad Lemmy is the extent of my social media exposure.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Did anyone actually know what this acronym was supposed to mean without checking the article?

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago

I'm still rocking a Galaxy S9+ with no intent of upgrading. I don't even know what phone I would go with if I did need another.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

If by common knowledge, you mean that a significant portion of the population believes it, I'm not sure how reliable that evidence that is. People will believe a whole lot of strange stuff.

On topic, even the first paragraph of the Wikipedia page states that it was "popularized by cooks from India living in Great Britain". Regardless of where it was first created, this is clearly the product of Indian immigrants. I don't believe their heritage should be ignored just because they moved. Although, I don't want it to sound like I believe in a 100% black and white distinction here. It's clearly a fusion dish with British influences. The original chicken tikka was a lot dryer and the "masala" sauce was added to make the dish creamier to appeal to British tastes.

However, I don't go around claiming General Tso's chicken isn't Chinese food, just because it was first made in New York; or that the chimichanga isn't Mexican food, just because it was originally made in Arizona; or that a Cuban sandwich isn't Cuban, just because it was first made in Florida. These dishes wouldn't exist without the immigrants who modified their cultural recipes to adapt to a new environment.

To me, chicken tikka malala is an Indian dish with British influences.

E: Tao to Tso.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago

Gang rape is democracy in action.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works -1 points 5 months ago

No funny allowed.

[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works -5 points 5 months ago

Dude, it was a joke.

view more: ‹ prev next ›